From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755754AbYL2KZa (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Dec 2008 05:25:30 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753604AbYL2KZU (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Dec 2008 05:25:20 -0500 Received: from rhlx01.hs-esslingen.de ([129.143.116.10]:47062 "EHLO rhlx01.hs-esslingen.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752706AbYL2KZT (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Dec 2008 05:25:19 -0500 Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2008 11:25:15 +0100 From: Andreas Mohr To: David Miller Cc: torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, bunk@kernel.org, Jeff Kirsher , auke-jan.h.kok@intel.com, e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [GIT]: Networking Message-ID: <20081229102515.GA17171@rhlx01.hs-esslingen.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20081228.000118.121541932.davem@davemloft.net> X-Priority: none User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, > Adrian Bunk (1): > > The overdue eepro100 removal. That would be a rather pronounced NAK then? (sorry ;) (reason: rendering my web surfing box useless due to networking loss, see thread "[RFC/PATCH] e100 driver didn't support any MII-less PHYs...") AFAICS e100 is still "non-MII"-challenged (2.6.28 doesn't appear to have the necessary changes, and this pull doesn't seem to contain updates either), and a long chain of attempts to get this resolved hasn't worked yet. Somehow I seem to hit some nice walls getting my stuff into kernel. - e100 MII - i810 AGP resume fix - acx100 (ok, that one is a bit mean to add to this list ;) - ... ALSA patches handled by Takashi OTOH were almost always a "bammm, in it is, there you are, HAND". I can't seem to wash away my slightly CK'ish feeling ;) Thanks, Andreas Mohr