From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>
To: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 6/6] ide: remove now redundant ->cur_dev checks
Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2008 20:04:49 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081229190449.1020.75781.sendpatchset@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081229190415.1020.43119.sendpatchset@localhost.localdomain>
From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH] ide: remove now redundant ->cur_dev checks
* ->cur_dev should now be always valid if ->handler is set so
remove redundant checks from ide_intr() and ide_timer_expiry().
* Apply CodingStyle fixups in ide_timer_expiry() while at it.
There should be no functional changes caused by this patch.
Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>
---
drivers/ide/ide-io.c | 105 +++++++++++++++++++++------------------------------
1 file changed, 45 insertions(+), 60 deletions(-)
Index: b/drivers/ide/ide-io.c
===================================================================
--- a/drivers/ide/ide-io.c
+++ b/drivers/ide/ide-io.c
@@ -920,60 +920,55 @@ void ide_timer_expiry (unsigned long dat
* Either way, we don't really want to complain about anything.
*/
} else {
+ ide_expiry_t *expiry = hwif->expiry;
+ ide_startstop_t startstop = ide_stopped;
+
drive = hwif->cur_dev;
- if (!drive) {
- printk(KERN_ERR "%s: ->cur_dev was NULL\n", __func__);
- hwif->handler = NULL;
- } else {
- ide_expiry_t *expiry = hwif->expiry;
- ide_startstop_t startstop = ide_stopped;
- if (expiry) {
- /* continue */
- if ((wait = expiry(drive)) > 0) {
- /* reset timer */
- hwif->timer.expires = jiffies + wait;
- hwif->req_gen_timer = hwif->req_gen;
- add_timer(&hwif->timer);
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&hwif->lock, flags);
- return;
- }
- }
- hwif->handler = NULL;
- /*
- * We need to simulate a real interrupt when invoking
- * the handler() function, which means we need to
- * globally mask the specific IRQ:
- */
- spin_unlock(&hwif->lock);
- /* disable_irq_nosync ?? */
- disable_irq(hwif->irq);
- /* local CPU only,
- * as if we were handling an interrupt */
- local_irq_disable();
- if (hwif->polling) {
- startstop = handler(drive);
- } else if (drive_is_ready(drive)) {
- if (drive->waiting_for_dma)
- hwif->dma_ops->dma_lost_irq(drive);
- (void)ide_ack_intr(hwif);
- printk(KERN_WARNING "%s: lost interrupt\n", drive->name);
- startstop = handler(drive);
- } else {
- if (drive->waiting_for_dma) {
- startstop = ide_dma_timeout_retry(drive, wait);
- } else
- startstop =
- ide_error(drive, "irq timeout",
- hwif->tp_ops->read_status(hwif));
- }
- spin_lock_irq(&hwif->lock);
- enable_irq(hwif->irq);
- if (startstop == ide_stopped) {
- ide_unlock_port(hwif);
- plug_device = 1;
+ if (expiry) {
+ wait = expiry(drive);
+ if (wait > 0) { /* continue */
+ /* reset timer */
+ hwif->timer.expires = jiffies + wait;
+ hwif->req_gen_timer = hwif->req_gen;
+ add_timer(&hwif->timer);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&hwif->lock, flags);
+ return;
}
}
+ hwif->handler = NULL;
+ /*
+ * We need to simulate a real interrupt when invoking
+ * the handler() function, which means we need to
+ * globally mask the specific IRQ:
+ */
+ spin_unlock(&hwif->lock);
+ /* disable_irq_nosync ?? */
+ disable_irq(hwif->irq);
+ /* local CPU only, as if we were handling an interrupt */
+ local_irq_disable();
+ if (hwif->polling) {
+ startstop = handler(drive);
+ } else if (drive_is_ready(drive)) {
+ if (drive->waiting_for_dma)
+ hwif->dma_ops->dma_lost_irq(drive);
+ (void)ide_ack_intr(hwif);
+ printk(KERN_WARNING "%s: lost interrupt\n",
+ drive->name);
+ startstop = handler(drive);
+ } else {
+ if (drive->waiting_for_dma)
+ startstop = ide_dma_timeout_retry(drive, wait);
+ else
+ startstop = ide_error(drive, "irq timeout",
+ hwif->tp_ops->read_status(hwif));
+ }
+ spin_lock_irq(&hwif->lock);
+ enable_irq(hwif->irq);
+ if (startstop == ide_stopped) {
+ ide_unlock_port(hwif);
+ plug_device = 1;
+ }
}
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&hwif->lock, flags);
@@ -1115,15 +1110,6 @@ irqreturn_t ide_intr (int irq, void *dev
}
drive = hwif->cur_dev;
- if (!drive) {
- /*
- * This should NEVER happen, and there isn't much
- * we could do about it here.
- *
- * [Note - this can occur if the drive is hot unplugged]
- */
- goto out_handled;
- }
if (!drive_is_ready(drive))
/*
@@ -1162,7 +1148,6 @@ irqreturn_t ide_intr (int irq, void *dev
ide_unlock_port(hwif);
plug_device = 1;
}
-out_handled:
irq_ret = IRQ_HANDLED;
out:
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&hwif->lock, flags);
prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-12-29 19:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-12-29 19:04 [PATCH 1/6] ide: make "paranoia" ->handler check in ide_intr() more strict Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2008-12-29 19:04 ` [PATCH 2/6] ide: use ide_pci_is_in_compatibility_mode() helper in setup-pci.c Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2008-12-29 19:04 ` [PATCH 3/6] ide: remove superfluous hwif variable assignment from ide_timer_expiry() Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2008-12-29 19:04 ` [PATCH 4/6] ide: struct ide_atapi_pc - remove unused fields and update documentation Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2008-12-29 19:04 ` [PATCH 5/6] ide: remove unused ide_hwif_t.sg_mapped field Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2008-12-29 19:04 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20081229190449.1020.75781.sendpatchset@localhost.localdomain \
--to=bzolnier@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox