From: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
To: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 7/7] iov_iter, block: Make bio structs pin pages rather than ref'ing if appropriate
Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2023 21:37:35 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2008444.1673300255@warthog.procyon.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230109173513.htfqbkrtqm52pnye@quack3>
Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> wrote:
> So currently we already have BIO_NO_PAGE_REF flag and what you do in this
> patch partially duplicates that. So either I'd drop that flag or instead of
> bi_cleanup_mode variable (which honestly looks a bit wasteful given how we
> microoptimize struct bio) just add another BIO_ flag...
I'm fine with translating the FOLL_* flags to the BIO_* flags. I could add a
BIO_PAGE_PINNED and translate:
FOLL_GET => 0
FOLL_PIN => BIO_PAGE_PINNED
0 => BIO_NO_PAGE_REF
It would seem that BIO_NO_PAGE_REF can't be set for BIO_PAGE_PINNED because
BIO_NO_PAGE_REF governs whether bio_release_pages() calls
__bio_release_pages() - which would be necessary. However, bio_release_page()
can do one or the other on the basis of BIO_PAGE_PINNED being specified. So
in my patch I would end up with:
static void bio_release_page(struct bio *bio, struct page *page)
{
if (bio->bi_flags & BIO_NO_PAGE_REF)
;
else if (bio->bi_flags & BIO_PAGE_PINNED)
unpin_user_page(page);
else
put_page(page);
}
(This is called from four places, so it has to handle BIO_NO_PAGE_REF).
It might make sense flip the logic of BIO_NO_PAGE_REF so that we have, say:
FOLL_GET => BIO_PAGE_REFFED
FOLL_PIN => BIO_PAGE_PINNED
0 => 0
Set BIO_PAGE_REFFED by default and clear it in bio_iov_bvec_set().
Note that one reason I was thinking of saving the returned FOLL_* flags is
that I don't know if, at some point, the VM will acquire yet more different
cleanup modes - or even if a page could at some point be both ref'd *and*
pinned.
Also, I could change the interface to return something other than FOLL_* - it
just seems that they're appropriate given the underlying VM interface.
David
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-01-09 21:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-01-07 0:33 [PATCH v4 0/7] iov_iter: Add extraction helpers David Howells
2023-01-07 0:33 ` [PATCH v4 1/7] iov_iter: Change the direction macros into an enum David Howells
2023-01-07 0:33 ` [PATCH v4 2/7] iov_iter: Use the direction in the iterator functions David Howells
2023-01-07 0:33 ` [PATCH v4 3/7] iov_iter: Use IOCB/IOMAP_WRITE if available rather than iterator direction David Howells
2023-01-07 0:33 ` [PATCH v4 4/7] iov_iter: Add a function to extract a page list from an iterator David Howells
2023-01-07 0:34 ` [PATCH v4 5/7] netfs: Add a function to extract a UBUF or IOVEC into a BVEC iterator David Howells
2023-01-07 0:34 ` [PATCH v4 6/7] netfs: Add a function to extract an iterator into a scatterlist David Howells
2023-01-07 0:34 ` [PATCH v4 7/7] iov_iter, block: Make bio structs pin pages rather than ref'ing if appropriate David Howells
2023-01-09 3:54 ` Jens Axboe
2023-01-09 9:43 ` David Howells
2023-01-09 17:25 ` Jan Kara
2023-01-10 14:42 ` David Howells
2023-01-11 9:58 ` Jan Kara
2023-01-09 17:27 ` Jens Axboe
2023-01-09 17:35 ` Jan Kara
2023-01-09 21:37 ` David Howells [this message]
2023-01-09 21:57 ` Jens Axboe
2023-01-09 22:24 ` David Howells
2023-01-09 22:57 ` Jens Axboe
2023-01-10 14:37 ` David Howells
2023-01-10 21:41 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2008444.1673300255@warthog.procyon.org.uk \
--to=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=jlayton@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=logang@deltatee.com \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox