public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com>
Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Subject: Re: random.c changes for sparse irq_desc are crap
Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2009 16:59:22 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090102155922.GD1180@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1230802316.3204.4.camel@calx>


* Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com> wrote:

> On Wed, 2008-12-31 at 16:14 -0800, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 31, 2008 at 3:40 PM, Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com> wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2008-12-31 at 15:07 -0800, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> > >> Matt Mackall wrote:
> > >> > I just noticed you merged a change that pointlessly converts two
> > >> > random.c functions into ugly random.h inlines without going through the
> > >> > maintainer.
> > >> >
> > >> > I also don't like the look of the newly-introduced sparse variants of
> > >> > these functions. Failure to find an irq descriptor in
> > >> > get_timer_rand_state is a BUG_ON should-never-happen sort of condition,
> > >> > not something to silently ignore. Letting the code try to dereference
> > >> > NULL is preferred here: we'll actually be able to find and fix the
> > >> > broken driver that's throwing around meaningless irq vectors.
> > >> >
> > >> > Throwing away the timer_state pointer in the set_timer_rand_state
> > >> > function is similarly bogus in addition to being a memory leak.
> > >> >
> > >> > Please fix this up.
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >> want something like this?
> > >
> > > Not quite.
> > >
> > > First, please turn these back into normal functions in random.c.
> > > Inlining functions is generally discouraged these days unless you have a
> > > good reason and numbers to back it up.
> > 
> > Ingo wanted to hide that #ifdef to .h
> 
> Ahh. I think that makes sense in some situations, but I'd prefer not to 
> do that here. Some headers are actually meant to be more readable than 
> the corresponding .c file. Also, we still end up with an ifdef in the .c 
> file so we're not actually winning.

Yinghai - i think Matt is right and there are a number of things we could 
do to improve cleanliness here. (Matt, sorry about this - we'll quickly 
fix it.)

The most important thing to observe is that the irq_desc->timer_rand_state 
cleanup you did should be made unconditional, and should not depend on 
SPARSE_IRQ. That will eliminate most of the #ifdefs, and it makes the 
random.c and random.h impact rather straightforward.

Another cleanliness detail is that these types of checks:

#ifndef CONFIG_SPARSE_IRQ
        if (irq >= nr_irqs)
                return;
#endif

can go away completely. They were needed from the sparseirq data model 
that had a dynamic array size - but that is not so anymore, so we can 
remove these complications.

Agreed?

	Ingo

  reply	other threads:[~2009-01-02 15:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-12-31 18:29 random.c changes for sparse irq_desc are crap Matt Mackall
2008-12-31 23:07 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-12-31 23:40   ` Matt Mackall
2009-01-01  0:14     ` Yinghai Lu
2009-01-01  9:31       ` Matt Mackall
2009-01-02 15:59         ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2009-01-03  8:06           ` [PATCH] sparseirq: move set/get_timer_rand_state back to .c Yinghai Lu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090102155922.GD1180@elte.hu \
    --to=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mpm@selenic.com \
    --cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
    --cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox