public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca>
To: Eduard - Gabriel Munteanu <eduard.munteanu@linux360.ro>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>,
	Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Dipankar Sarma <dipankar@in.ibm.com>,
	Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] kmemtrace: Use tracepoints instead of markers.
Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2009 18:32:45 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090102233245.GA29623@Krystal> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090102223850.GA5235@localhost>

* Eduard - Gabriel Munteanu (eduard.munteanu@linux360.ro) wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 02, 2009 at 04:48:05PM -0500, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> > Yes, we could (and maybe should) use __always_inline there. Hrm, which
> > which tree to you work ? You probably mean DECLARE_TRACE() rather than
> > DEFINE_TRACE() ?
> > 
> > I just went over your patch again. it uses the old DEFINE_TRACE() API.
> > You should get the latest tracepoints which have DECLARE_TRACE() (for
> > trace/kmemtrace.h) and then a DEFINE_TRACE() in a .c.  Ah I see, you
> > work on 2.6.28. You should work on top of -tip, which has this new API.
> > Using the tracepoints present in 2.6.28 will not let you do only a
> > single definition of the tracepoint structure and it will lead to waste
> > of kernel memory by defining multiple instances of tracepoint structures
> > (one for each trace_*() use, so one per kmalloc()). The
> > Documentation/tracepoints.txt file is updated accordingly.
> > 
> 
> I'm supposed to merge it through Ingo's tip tree. If we're talking about
> the same tree, I'll do as you suggested.
> 
> > > But it is quite pointless. Sometimes we need _RET_IP_, sometimes
> > > _THIS_IP_ and sometimes a parameter we've been passed. That's because we
> > > want the IP of the caller, so it depends on whether this slab function
> > > is __always_inline, non-inlined or deeply nested within other functions
> > > (which can be as well __always_inline or non-inlined).
> > > 
> > 
> > Hrm ? In the case we just want
> > 
> >   trace_kmalloc(_THIS_IP, ......);
> > 
> > If we have __always_inline for the trace_*() declaration, isn't it the
> > same to just do this in the probe ?
> > 
> > void probe_kmalloc(......)
> > {
> >   ... _RET_IP_ ...;
> > 
> > }
> > 
> > This would remove a parameter from the stack created from the
> > instrumentation site, which is always good.
> 
> No, it's not always possible. Not all allocator functions (not even
> those of the same kind, as in alloc/free) make up an __always_inline
> chain. For example, there is one or a few instances where we pass a
> value other than _RET_IP_ or _THIS_IP_ to probes. It's quite hard to
> untangle things without making extensive modifications.
> 

OK, so let's leave the caller ip parameter then.

Mathieu

> > Mathieu
> > 
> > > 
> > > 	Eduard
> > > 
> > 
> > -- 
> > Mathieu Desnoyers
> > OpenPGP key fingerprint: 8CD5 52C3 8E3C 4140 715F  BA06 3F25 A8FE 3BAE 9A68

-- 
Mathieu Desnoyers
OpenPGP key fingerprint: 8CD5 52C3 8E3C 4140 715F  BA06 3F25 A8FE 3BAE 9A68

  reply	other threads:[~2009-01-02 23:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-12-30  7:41 [PATCH 0/2] kmemtrace over tracepoints (resubmit) Eduard - Gabriel Munteanu
2008-12-30  7:41 ` [PATCH 1/2] RCU: Don't include unnecessary headers, allow kmemtrace w/ tracepoints Eduard - Gabriel Munteanu
2008-12-30  7:49   ` Ingo Molnar
2008-12-30  7:53     ` Ingo Molnar
2008-12-30  8:14       ` Eduard - Gabriel Munteanu
2008-12-30  8:21         ` Ingo Molnar
2008-12-30  7:41 ` [PATCH 2/2] kmemtrace: Use tracepoints instead of markers Eduard - Gabriel Munteanu
2008-12-30  7:50   ` Pekka Enberg
2008-12-30 12:40   ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2008-12-30 14:02     ` Eduard - Gabriel Munteanu
2009-01-02 21:48       ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2009-01-02 22:38         ` Eduard - Gabriel Munteanu
2009-01-02 23:32           ` Mathieu Desnoyers [this message]
2008-12-31  3:56 ` [PATCH 0/2] kmemtrace over tracepoints (resubmit) Paul E. McKenney

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090102233245.GA29623@Krystal \
    --to=mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca \
    --cc=acme@redhat.com \
    --cc=adobriyan@gmail.com \
    --cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=eduard.munteanu@linux360.ro \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=penberg@cs.helsinki.fi \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox