public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] x86: amd_iommu.c prealloc_protection_domains should be static
@ 2008-12-29 16:15 Jaswinder Singh Rajput
  2009-01-03 15:50 ` Joerg Roedel
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Jaswinder Singh Rajput @ 2008-12-29 16:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Ingo Molnar, joerg.roedel, leo.duran, x86 maintainers, LKML

Impact: cleanup, reduce kernel size a bit, avoid sparse warning

Fixes sparse warning:
arch/x86/kernel/amd_iommu.c:1299:6: warning: symbol 'prealloc_protection_domains' was not declared. Should it be static?

Signed-off-by: Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinderrajput@gmail.com>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/amd_iommu.c |    2 +-
 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/amd_iommu.c b/arch/x86/kernel/amd_iommu.c
index 2e2da71..658e29e 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/amd_iommu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/amd_iommu.c
@@ -1296,7 +1296,7 @@ static int amd_iommu_dma_supported(struct device *dev, u64 mask)
  * we don't need to preallocate the protection domains anymore.
  * For now we have to.
  */
-void prealloc_protection_domains(void)
+static void prealloc_protection_domains(void)
 {
 	struct pci_dev *dev = NULL;
 	struct dma_ops_domain *dma_dom;
-- 
1.5.5.1




^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2009-01-03 15:51 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2008-12-29 16:15 [PATCH] x86: amd_iommu.c prealloc_protection_domains should be static Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-01-03 15:50 ` Joerg Roedel

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox