From: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
To: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, x86@kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [1/5] Only scan the root bus in early PCI quirks.
Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 02:46:45 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090105014645.GD496@one.firstfloor.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <86802c440901041551y321329e1l9c40186fc381f355@mail.gmail.com>
> two cases:
> 1. how about system with two or more HT chains, and second will be
> 0x40, x0x80, or 0xc0 ?
The early quirks code only cares about the first south bridge,
it's essentially just a chipset detect. So secondaries do not
matter.
> 2. some system with LinuxBIOS, could put first chain on bus 1
Do they or do they not? Please be specific.
Anyways AntiLinuxBIOS doesn't have ACPI and early-quirks.c is 80%+ ACPI
workarounds so they don't apply. The only exceptions are the VIA
detect or the the HT broadcast workaround. I suppose both do not
apply to these LB systems.
-Andi
--
ak@linux.intel.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-01-05 1:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-01-04 23:36 [PATCH] [0/5] Couple of x86 patches for 2.6.29 Andi Kleen
2009-01-04 23:36 ` [PATCH] [1/5] Only scan the root bus in early PCI quirks Andi Kleen
2009-01-04 23:51 ` Yinghai Lu
2009-01-05 1:46 ` Andi Kleen [this message]
2009-01-04 23:36 ` [PATCH] [2/5] Allow HPET force enable on ICH10 HPET Andi Kleen
2009-01-04 23:36 ` [PATCH] [3/5] Mark complex bitops.h inlines as __always_inline Andi Kleen
2009-01-06 0:03 ` Andrew Morton
2009-01-06 10:17 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-06 14:32 ` Andi Kleen
2009-01-07 13:26 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-07 19:46 ` Andi Kleen
2009-01-06 19:17 ` Hugh Dickins
2009-01-07 13:18 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-08 2:16 ` Hugh Dickins
2009-01-08 5:07 ` Andi Kleen
2009-01-08 8:04 ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-01-04 23:36 ` [PATCH] [4/5] Use asm stubs for 32bit sigreturn codes Andi Kleen
2009-01-05 0:08 ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-01-04 23:36 ` [PATCH] [5/5] Avoid theoretical vmalloc fault loop Andi Kleen
2009-01-05 11:47 ` Nick Piggin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090105014645.GD496@one.firstfloor.org \
--to=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox