From: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: Peter Klotz <peter.klotz@aon.at>,
Roman Kononov <kernel@kononov.ftml.net>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: BUG: soft lockup - is this XFS problem?
Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 02:48:21 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090105014821.GA367@wotan.suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090103214443.GA6612@infradead.org>
On Sat, Jan 03, 2009 at 04:44:43PM -0500, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 30, 2008 at 05:23:33AM +0100, Nick Piggin wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 12:12:59PM -0500, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > >
> > > Nick, I've seen various reports like this by Roman. It seems to be
> > > caused by an interaction of the lockless pagecache with the xfs
> > > I/O code. Any idea what might be wrong here:
> >
> > Hmm, it could get into a loop here if there is a page in the pagecache
> > with a zero refcount, which might be a problem with XFS... other looping
> > conditions might indicate a problem iwth lockless pagecache or radix
> > tree. It would be very helpful to know what condition it is looping on...
>
> See http://oss.sgi.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=805
OK.. Hmm, well here is a modification to your patch which might help further.
I'll see if I can reproduce it here meanwhile.
---
mm/filemap.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++----
1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
Index: linux-2.6/mm/filemap.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/mm/filemap.c
+++ linux-2.6/mm/filemap.c
@@ -770,11 +770,13 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(find_or_create_page);
* find_get_pages() returns the number of pages which were found.
*/
unsigned find_get_pages(struct address_space *mapping, pgoff_t start,
- unsigned int nr_pages, struct page **pages)
+ unsigned int nr_pages,
+ struct page **pages)
{
unsigned int i;
unsigned int ret;
unsigned int nr_found;
+ int locked = 0;
rcu_read_lock();
restart:
@@ -785,27 +787,46 @@ restart:
struct page *page;
repeat:
page = radix_tree_deref_slot((void **)pages[i]);
- if (unlikely(!page))
+ if (unlikely(!page)) {
+ if (printk_ratelimit())
+ printk(KERN_INFO "unable to deref page\n");
continue;
+ }
+
/*
* this can only trigger if nr_found == 1, making livelock
* a non issue.
*/
- if (unlikely(page == RADIX_TREE_RETRY))
+ if (unlikely(page == RADIX_TREE_RETRY)) {
+ printk(KERN_INFO "got RADIX_TREE_RETRY\n");
goto restart;
+ }
- if (!page_cache_get_speculative(page))
+ if (!page_cache_get_speculative(page)) {
+ /* If the page is in the radix-tree, and the radix-tree
+ * is locked, the page must have a non-zero refcount */
+ BUG_ON(locked);
+ printk(KERN_INFO "page_cache_get failed\n");
+ spin_lock_irq(&mapping->tree_lock);
+ locked = 1;
goto repeat;
+ }
/* Has the page moved? */
if (unlikely(page != *((void **)pages[i]))) {
+ BUG_ON(locked);
+ printk(KERN_INFO "page moved\n");
page_cache_release(page);
+ spin_lock_irq(&mapping->tree_lock);
+ locked = 1;
goto repeat;
}
pages[ret] = page;
ret++;
}
+ if (locked)
+ spin_unlock_irq(&mapping->tree_lock);
rcu_read_unlock();
return ret;
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-01-05 1:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-12-19 6:59 BUG: soft lockup - is this XFS problem? Roman Kononov
2008-12-23 17:12 ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-12-30 4:23 ` Nick Piggin
2009-01-03 21:44 ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-01-05 1:48 ` Nick Piggin [this message]
2009-01-05 4:19 ` Nick Piggin
2009-01-05 6:48 ` Nick Piggin
2009-01-05 14:25 ` Roman Kononov
2009-01-05 16:21 ` Peter Klotz
2009-01-05 16:41 ` [patch] mm: fix lockless pagecache reordering bug (was Re: BUG: soft lockup - is this XFS problem?) Nick Piggin
2009-01-05 17:30 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-01-05 18:00 ` Nick Piggin
2009-01-05 18:44 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-01-05 19:39 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-01-06 17:17 ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-01-05 20:12 ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-01-05 20:39 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-01-05 21:57 ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-01-06 2:05 ` Nick Piggin
2009-01-06 2:23 ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-01-06 2:29 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-01-06 8:38 ` Peter Klotz
2009-01-06 8:43 ` Nick Piggin
2009-01-06 16:16 ` Roman Kononov
2009-01-05 21:04 ` [patch] mm: fix lockless pagecache reordering bug (was Peter Zijlstra
2009-01-05 21:58 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-07-14 11:23 ` BUG: soft lockup - is this XFS problem? Guus Sliepen
2011-07-14 18:03 ` Peter Klotz
2011-07-14 19:29 ` Guus Sliepen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090105014821.GA367@wotan.suse.de \
--to=npiggin@suse.de \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=kernel@kononov.ftml.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peter.klotz@aon.at \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox