From: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux PCI <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86 PCI: Do not use interrupt links for devices using MSI-X
Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 11:53:07 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200901051153.07860.jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090105130439.GA6014@elte.hu>
On Monday, January 5, 2009 5:04 am Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
> > From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
> >
> > pcibios_enable_device() and pcibios_disable_device() don't handle
> > IRQs for devices that have MSI enabled and it should tread the
>
> s/tread/treat
>
> > devices with MSI-X enabled in the same way.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
> > ---
> > arch/x86/pci/common.c | 4 ++--
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> looks good - Jesse, what do you think?
Yeah, seems obviously correct, I'll queue it up.
> Rafael, i'm curious is this in response to some regression/bug? Did some
> box or driver get confused by us enabling/disabling the GSI? Some IRQ
> flood perhaps?
>
> btw., there's a small observation:
> > + if (!dev->msi_enabled && !dev->msix_enabled)
>
> maybe a "pci_has_gsi_irq()" wrapper would make these checks cleaner and
> would make things more robust, should there be any new IRQ delivery method
> be introduced in the future?
pci_has_msi_irq surely? Otherwise we'll catch pretty much everything? Or did
you mean !pci_has_gsi_irq() here instead?
Thanks,
--
Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technology Center
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-01-05 19:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-01-04 22:08 [PATCH] x86 PCI: Do not use interrupt links for devices using MSI-X Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-01-05 13:04 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-05 13:50 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-01-05 19:55 ` Jesse Barnes
2009-01-05 19:53 ` Jesse Barnes [this message]
2009-01-07 13:13 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-07 17:33 ` Jesse Barnes
2009-01-07 17:45 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-07 18:12 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-01-06 17:19 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2009-01-06 19:45 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200901051153.07860.jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org \
--to=jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox