From: Ben Dooks <ben-linux@fluff.org>
To: Clifford Wolf <clifford@clifford.at>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
khali@linux-fr.org, adrian@humboldt.co.uk
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Incremental i2c-mpc driver fix for multi-master i2c busses.
Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 10:23:38 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090106102338.GM12431@fluff.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090105132102.GA27855@clifford.at>
On Mon, Jan 05, 2009 at 02:21:02PM +0100, Clifford Wolf wrote:
> Incremental i2c-mpc driver fix for multi-master i2c busses.
Hi, you missed linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org which is the new home
for the i2c list. You should have received an auto-reply about
how this list has moved.
I'll probably try and get another merge out sometime this week.
> This is an incremental bugfix for the i2c-mpc driver. It is based
> on the bugfix I've sent on 2008-12-22:
>
> http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/12/22/99
>
> There still was a remaining problem with multi-master i2c busses
> when an i2c bus access is interrupted by a unix signal while
> waiting for bus arbitration.
>
> This is an extreamly rare case but I managed to stumble over it in
> multi master i2c performance tests.
>
> Tested with a freescale MPC8349E host cpu.
>
> Signed-off-by: Clifford Wolf <clifford@clifford.at>
>
> --- drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-mpc.c (revision 2216)
> +++ drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-mpc.c (working copy)
> @@ -105,7 +105,7 @@
> schedule();
> if (time_after(jiffies, orig_jiffies + timeout)) {
> pr_debug("I2C: timeout\n");
> - writeccr(i2c, 0);
> + writeccr(i2c, CCR_MEN);
> result = -EIO;
> break;
> }
> @@ -119,10 +119,10 @@
>
> if (unlikely(result < 0)) {
> pr_debug("I2C: wait interrupted\n");
> - writeccr(i2c, 0);
> + writeccr(i2c, CCR_MEN);
> } else if (unlikely(!(i2c->interrupt & CSR_MIF))) {
> pr_debug("I2C: wait timeout\n");
> - writeccr(i2c, 0);
> + writeccr(i2c, CCR_MEN);
> result = -ETIMEDOUT;
> }
>
> @@ -267,7 +267,7 @@
> while (readb(i2c->base + MPC_I2C_SR) & CSR_MBB) {
> if (signal_pending(current)) {
> pr_debug("I2C: Interrupted\n");
> - writeccr(i2c, 0);
> + writeccr(i2c, CCR_MEN);
> return -EINTR;
> }
> if (time_after(jiffies, orig_jiffies + HZ)) {
> @@ -369,6 +369,15 @@
> goto fail_add;
> }
>
> + /* Make sure the adapter is already in master mode some time before
> + * the first xfer to make sure arbitration control had enough time
> + * to monitor the bus. The CCR_MEN flag should never be cleared without
> + * makeing sure there is some delay between setting it again and
> + * starting the first transfer..
> + */
> + writeccr(i2c, CCR_MEN);
> + udelay(100);
> +
> return result;
>
> fail_add:
--
Ben (ben@fluff.org, http://www.fluff.org/)
'a smiley only costs 4 bytes'
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-01-06 10:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-01-05 13:21 [PATCH] Incremental i2c-mpc driver fix for multi-master i2c busses Clifford Wolf
2009-01-06 10:23 ` Ben Dooks [this message]
2009-01-12 22:12 ` Andrew Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090106102338.GM12431@fluff.org.uk \
--to=ben-linux@fluff.org \
--cc=adrian@humboldt.co.uk \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=clifford@clifford.at \
--cc=khali@linux-fr.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox