From: Vaidyanathan Srinivasan <svaidy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Subject: Re: [BUG] 2.6.28-git LOCKDEP: Possible recursive rq->lock
Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 19:32:07 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090106140207.GE4574@dirshya.in.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090105130638.GB6014@elte.hu>
* Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> [2009-01-05 14:06:38]:
>
> * Vaidyanathan Srinivasan <svaidy@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> > * Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> [2009-01-04 19:08:43]:
> >
> > > On Sun, 2009-01-04 at 23:14 +0530, Vaidyanathan Srinivasan wrote:
> > > > Hi Ingo,
> > > >
> > > > Kernbench runs on latest Linux git tree stalled with the following
> > > > lockdep warning.
> > > >
> > > > Lockdep warning and lockup on Jan 3 Linus git tree
> > > > commit 7d3b56ba37a95f1f370f50258ed3954c304c524b
> > > >
> > > > kernbench run with two threads stalled. sched_mc was zero.
> > > > x86_64 system with 8 logical CPUs in dual socket quad core
> > > > configuration.
> > > >
> > > > I will post more information as I debug this warning/bug.
> > >
> > > Its ca109491f612aab5c8152207631c0444f63da97f, I've some ideas on how to
> > > fix this, just haven't gotten around to actually doing anything --
> > > seeing how it was holidays and such..
> >
> > Hi Peter,
> >
> > I can definitely test your fix when you have them. I have an
> > autotest job that hits this bug.
>
> could you check latest tip/master, it has Peter's and Thomas's hrtimer
> fixes.
Hi Peter,
I queued the same kernbench runs with the latest tip. The run
completed without any lockups, but I still got one lockdep warning.
sched-tip date Jan 5 commit:4c1ae1dfea7a5fcab3444220a38054dd50c08441
kernel: =============================================
kernel: [ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ]
kernel: 2.6.28-autotest-tip-sv #1
kernel: ---------------------------------------------
kernel: autotest/6012 is trying to acquire lock:
kernel: (&rq->lock){++..}, at: [<ffffffff8022a4dd>] task_rq_lock+0x44/0x7e
kernel:
kernel: but task is already holding lock:
kernel: (&rq->lock){++..}, at: [<ffffffff805d6000>] schedule+0x144/0x9e5
kernel:
kernel: other info that might help us debug this:
kernel: 1 lock held by autotest/6012:
kernel: #0: (&rq->lock){++..}, at: [<ffffffff805d6000>] schedule+0x144/0x9e5
kernel:
kernel: stack backtrace:
kernel: Pid: 6012, comm: autotest Not tainted 2.6.28-autotest-tip-sv #1
kernel: Call Trace:
kernel: [<ffffffff80257a0c>] __lock_acquire+0xe2a/0x15ed
kernel: [<ffffffff80258254>] lock_acquire+0x85/0xa9
kernel: [<ffffffff8022a4dd>] task_rq_lock+0x44/0x7e
kernel: [<ffffffff805d8fac>] _spin_lock+0x2d/0x5f
kernel: [<ffffffff8022a4dd>] task_rq_lock+0x44/0x7e
kernel: [<ffffffff8022a4dd>] task_rq_lock+0x44/0x7e
kernel: [<ffffffff80232947>] try_to_wake_up+0x83/0x26f
kernel: [<ffffffff805d6000>] schedule+0x144/0x9e5
kernel: [<ffffffff805d6415>] schedule+0x559/0x9e5
kernel: [<ffffffff802562fc>] trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x120/0x14a
kernel: [<ffffffff8024b721>] hrtimer_start_range_ns+0x1e4/0x1f7
kernel: [<ffffffff805d7bda>] schedule_hrtimeout_range+0xcc/0xff
kernel: [<ffffffff8024af3d>] hrtimer_wakeup+0x0/0x22
kernel: [<ffffffff805d7bbc>] schedule_hrtimeout_range+0xae/0xff
kernel: [<ffffffff802ae194>] do_select+0x502/0x55d
kernel: [<ffffffff802adc92>] do_select+0x0/0x55d
kernel: [<ffffffff802ae70b>] __pollwait+0x0/0xe5
kernel: [<ffffffff80232b33>] default_wake_function+0x0/0x9
kernel: [<ffffffff80232b33>] default_wake_function+0x0/0x9
kernel: [<ffffffff80254211>] lock_release_holdtime+0x1b/0x16c
kernel: [<ffffffff802581b6>] __lock_acquire+0x15d4/0x15ed
last message repeated 2 times
kernel: [<ffffffff80254211>] lock_release_holdtime+0x1b/0x16c
kernel: [<ffffffff80254211>] lock_release_holdtime+0x1b/0x16c
kernel: [<ffffffff802ae220>] core_sys_select+0x31/0x2b0
kernel: [<ffffffff802ae3db>] core_sys_select+0x1ec/0x2b0
kernel: [<ffffffff802ae220>] core_sys_select+0x31/0x2b0
kernel: [<ffffffff80248d47>] remove_wait_queue+0x12/0x4d
kernel: [<ffffffff80254211>] lock_release_holdtime+0x1b/0x16c
kernel: [<ffffffff805d8e29>] _spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x3e/0x44
kernel: [<ffffffff802562fc>] trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x120/0x14a
kernel: [<ffffffff8023909b>] do_wait+0x2a4/0x395
kernel: [<ffffffff8024ec91>] getnstimeofday+0x56/0xb0
kernel: [<ffffffff802ae6e2>] sys_select+0x92/0xbb
kernel: [<ffffffff8020bedb>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
I will rerun and check again.
--Vaidy
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-01-06 13:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-01-04 17:44 [BUG] 2.6.28-git LOCKDEP: Possible recursive rq->lock Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2009-01-04 18:08 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-01-05 4:06 ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2009-01-05 13:06 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-06 7:10 ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2009-01-06 14:02 ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan [this message]
2009-01-07 11:49 ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2009-01-07 12:29 ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2009-01-07 13:12 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-01-07 14:20 ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2009-01-07 14:28 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-01-07 16:31 ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2009-01-07 18:09 ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2009-01-07 18:12 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090106140207.GE4574@dirshya.in.ibm.com \
--to=svaidy@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox