From: Theodore Tso <tytso@mit.edu>
To: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@novell.com>
Cc: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>,
ccache@lists.samba.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [REGRESSION] Recent change to kernel spikes out ccache/distcc
Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 12:33:00 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090106173300.GA10903@mit.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <496386EF.76E4.0078.0@novell.com>
On Tue, Jan 06, 2009 at 03:29:35PM +0000, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> 06.01.09 16:15 >>>
> >In the short term, though, it would be nice if we could get back a
> >simple way of making a kernel object file using just cc, so that ccache
> >and distcc could be functional again. Does that seem reasonable?
>
> Making the new logic dependent on a config option would seem reasonable
> to me - of course at the expense of the respective Makefile becoming
> even less readable.
Too late. :-) It's pretty unreadable already.... as a result, I'm not
at all confident that I could make such a patch. Is this something
you could perhaps whip up? I'd really appreicate it, as it would
seriously speed up by kernel development efforts.
Regards,
- Ted
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-01-06 17:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-01-06 15:15 [REGRESSION] Recent change to kernel spikes out ccache/distcc Theodore Ts'o
2009-01-06 15:29 ` Jan Beulich
2009-01-06 17:33 ` Theodore Tso [this message]
2009-01-06 17:48 ` Sam Ravnborg
2009-01-06 18:04 ` Theodore Tso
2009-01-07 8:50 ` Jan Beulich
2009-01-07 11:31 ` Sam Ravnborg
2009-01-07 12:35 ` Jan Beulich
2009-01-07 13:23 ` Sam Ravnborg
2009-01-07 13:48 ` Jan Beulich
2009-01-07 20:06 ` Sam Ravnborg
2009-01-08 19:16 ` Kyle McMartin
2009-01-12 14:06 ` Gilles Espinasse
2009-01-06 17:53 ` Sam Ravnborg
2009-01-06 16:26 ` David Miller
2009-01-06 18:12 ` Theodore Tso
2009-01-06 22:09 ` Sam Ravnborg
2009-01-07 4:33 ` Theodore Tso
2009-01-07 5:10 ` Al Viro
2009-01-07 8:49 ` Jan Beulich
2009-01-07 14:03 ` Al Viro
2009-01-07 14:28 ` Jan Beulich
2009-01-07 14:37 ` Al Viro
2009-01-07 14:40 ` Jan Beulich
2009-01-07 13:12 ` Theodore Tso
2009-01-07 13:39 ` Jan Beulich
2009-01-07 14:28 ` Theodore Tso
2009-01-07 14:39 ` Jan Beulich
2009-01-08 19:17 ` Dave Jones
2009-01-08 21:31 ` Theodore Tso
2009-01-11 21:48 ` Kyle McMartin
2009-01-11 22:11 ` Theodore Tso
2009-01-11 22:51 ` Theodore Tso
2009-01-11 22:55 ` Kyle McMartin
2009-01-14 17:16 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-01-15 9:11 ` Jan Beulich
2009-01-15 13:40 ` Theodore Tso
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090106173300.GA10903@mit.edu \
--to=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=ccache@lists.samba.org \
--cc=jbeulich@novell.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sam@ravnborg.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox