From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: torvalds@linux-foundation.org
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk,
adobriyan@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
sparclinux@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: hardirq.h removal broke sparc64 build...
Date: Wed, 07 Jan 2009 15:30:05 -0800 (PST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090107.153005.136649913.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090107145822.625960f2.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: Text/Plain; charset=utf-8, Size: 3103 bytes --]
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 14:58:22 -0800
> On Wed, 07 Jan 2009 14:43:10 -0800 (PST)
> David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> wrote:
>
> > I've spent most of last night and this morning trying to figure out
> > a way to fix this, it is very non-trivial.
> >
> > Adding a simple asm/cpudata.h include into asm/topology_64.h for the
> > SMP case does not work.
> >
> > asm/cpudata.h brings in percpu.h which wants SLAB which wants to use
> > GFP_* values and thus includes gfp.h
> >
> > And thus because of the include loop:
...
> > we can't include asm/cpudata.h into asm/topology.h otherwise
> > we get:
...
> > for the drivers/base/topology.o build failure case above.
>
> yes, there were some nasty problems like that. In several cases we wimped
> out and added the necessary includes to the .c file. Will that (sad hack)
> work here?
Ok, this works.
Linus, please apply, thanks!
topology: Fix sparc64 build.
Due to changeset ba84be2338d3a2b6020d39279335bb06fcd332e1
("remove linux/hardirq.h from asm-generic/local.h") the
sparc64 build started failing on drivers/base/topology.c:
drivers/base/topology.c: In function âshow_physical_package_idâ:
drivers/base/topology.c:103: error: implicit declaration of function âcpu_dataâ
drivers/base/topology.c:103: error: request for member âproc_idâ in something not a structure or union
drivers/base/topology.c: In function âshow_core_idâ:
drivers/base/topology.c:106: error: request for member âcore_idâ in something not a structure or union
Adding the obvious fix of including asm/cpudata.h into
asm/topology.h on sparc64 doesn't fix it, in fact it
makes things worse because of the header file dependency
chain:
linux/gfp.h --> linux/mmzone.h --> linux/topology.h -->
asm/topology.h --> asm/cpudata.h --> linux/percpu.h -->
linux/slab.h
which results in:
include/linux/slub_def.h: In function âkmalloc_largeâ:
include/linux/slub_def.h:209: error: implicit declaration of function â__get_free_pagesâ
include/linux/slub_def.h:209: error: â__GFP_COMPâ undeclared (first use in this function)
include/linux/slub_def.h:209: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
include/linux/slub_def.h:209: error: for each function it appears in.)
include/linux/slub_def.h:209: warning: cast to pointer from integer of different size
The simplest thing to do is to add yet another one-off hack like
parts of the guilty changeset did, by putting an explicit
linux/hardirq.h include into drivers/base/topology.c
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
diff --git a/drivers/base/topology.c b/drivers/base/topology.c
index a8bc1cb..a778fb5 100644
--- a/drivers/base/topology.c
+++ b/drivers/base/topology.c
@@ -28,6 +28,7 @@
#include <linux/mm.h>
#include <linux/cpu.h>
#include <linux/module.h>
+#include <linux/hardirq.h>
#include <linux/topology.h>
#define define_one_ro(_name) \
ÿôèº{.nÇ+·®+%Ëÿ±éݶ\x17¥wÿº{.nÇ+·¥{±þG«éÿ{ayº\x1dÊÚë,j\a¢f£¢·hïêÿêçz_è®\x03(éÝ¢j"ú\x1a¶^[m§ÿÿ¾\a«þG«éÿ¢¸?¨èÚ&£ø§~á¶iOæ¬z·vØ^\x14\x04\x1a¶^[m§ÿÿÃ\fÿ¶ìÿ¢¸?I¥
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-01-07 23:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-01-07 22:43 hardirq.h removal broke sparc64 build David Miller
2009-01-07 22:58 ` Andrew Morton
2009-01-07 23:07 ` David Miller
2009-01-07 23:30 ` David Miller [this message]
2009-01-08 7:56 ` Sam Ravnborg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090107.153005.136649913.davem@davemloft.net \
--to=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=adobriyan@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=sparclinux@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox