Re: [PATCH 03/11] cpumask: update pci_bus_show_cpuaffinity to use new cpumask API

[Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>]

On Wednesday, January 7, 2009 7:19 am Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org> wrote:
> > On Monday, January 5, 2009 11:31 am Mike Travis wrote:
> > > Jesse Barnes wrote:
> > > > On Sunday, January 4, 2009 5:18 am Mike Travis wrote:
> > > >> Impact: cleanup, reduce stack usage, use new cpumask API.
> > > >>
> > > >> Replace the local cpumask_t variable with a pointer to the
> > > >> const cpumask that needs to be printed.
> > > >>
> > > >> Signed-off-by: Mike Travis <travis@sgi.com>
> > > >> Cc: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
> > > >
> > > > Can you resend these two against my linux-next branch?
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > Sure thing.  Would this be the latest .../sfr/linux-next.git master
> > > tree or would I need to select some other branch?
> >
> > That would probably work, but my actual tree is at
> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jbarnes/pci-2.6.git; the
> > linux- next branch is the one that I'll be sending to Linus soon.
>
> hm, i already have it queued up in tip/cpus4096:
>
> 588235b: cpumask: update pci_bus_show_cpuaffinity to use new cpumask API
>
> as you said that it would be fine to do it there. I guess it's not a
> problem to have it duplicate - the code changes one narrow area of code.

I don't have it queued in my tree; it depends on other changes in Linus' tree 
I haven't rebased to yet (will do today when I pull in Rafael's PCI 
suspend/resume fixes), but I'll let this stuff come through your tree alone.

Thanks,
-- 
Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technology Center