public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	Mike Travis <travis@sgi.com>, Paul Menage <menage@google.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] cpuset: convert cpuset_attach() to use cpumask_var_t
Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 12:34:50 +1030	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200901071234.51646.rusty@rustcorp.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090105010147.bc42b655.akpm@linux-foundation.org>

On Monday 05 January 2009 19:31:47 Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Mon, 05 Jan 2009 16:47:21 +0800 Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com> wrote:
> 
> > Allocate a global cpumask_var_t at boot, and use it in cpuset_attach(), so
> > we won't fail cpuset_attach().
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>
> > Acked-by: Mike Travis <travis@sgi.com>
> > ---
> >  kernel/cpuset.c |   14 +++++++++-----
> >  1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/kernel/cpuset.c b/kernel/cpuset.c
> > index afa29cf..1e32e6b 100644
> > --- a/kernel/cpuset.c
> > +++ b/kernel/cpuset.c
> > @@ -1306,6 +1306,9 @@ static int fmeter_getrate(struct fmeter *fmp)
> >  	return val;
> >  }
> >  
> > +/* Protected by cgroup_lock */
> > +static cpumask_var_t cpus_attach;
> > +
> >  /* Called by cgroups to determine if a cpuset is usable; cgroup_mutex held */
> >  static int cpuset_can_attach(struct cgroup_subsys *ss,
> >  			     struct cgroup *cont, struct task_struct *tsk)
> > @@ -1330,7 +1333,6 @@ static void cpuset_attach(struct cgroup_subsys *ss,
> >  			  struct cgroup *cont, struct cgroup *oldcont,
> >  			  struct task_struct *tsk)
> >  {
> > -	cpumask_t cpus;
> >  	nodemask_t from, to;
> >  	struct mm_struct *mm;
> >  	struct cpuset *cs = cgroup_cs(cont);
> > @@ -1338,13 +1340,13 @@ static void cpuset_attach(struct cgroup_subsys *ss,
> >  	int err;
> >  
> >  	if (cs == &top_cpuset) {
> > -		cpus = cpu_possible_map;
> > +		cpumask_copy(cpus_attach, cpu_possible_mask);
> >  	} else {
> >  		mutex_lock(&callback_mutex);
> > -		guarantee_online_cpus(cs, &cpus);
> > +		guarantee_online_cpus(cs, cpus_attach);
> >  		mutex_unlock(&callback_mutex);
> >  	}
> > -	err = set_cpus_allowed_ptr(tsk, &cpus);
> > +	err = set_cpus_allowed_ptr(tsk, cpus_attach);
> >  	if (err)
> >  		return;
> >  
> > @@ -1357,7 +1359,6 @@ static void cpuset_attach(struct cgroup_subsys *ss,
> >  			cpuset_migrate_mm(mm, &from, &to);
> >  		mmput(mm);
> >  	}
> > -
> >  }
> >  
> >  /* The various types of files and directories in a cpuset file system */
> > @@ -1838,6 +1839,9 @@ int __init cpuset_init(void)
> >  	if (err < 0)
> >  		return err;
> >  
> > +	if (!alloc_cpumask_var(&cpus_attach, GFP_KERNEL))
> > +		BUG();
> > +
> >  	number_of_cpusets = 1;
> >  	return 0;
> >  }
> 
> OK, that works.
> 
> Do we need to dynamically allocate cpus_attach?  Can we just do
> 
> static cpumask_t cpus_attach;

Well, (1) we're deprecating the typedef, (2) we really want the NR_CPUS=16384
and nr_cpu_ids=4 case not to suck and this sets a bad example, but moreover
(3) struct cpumask won't be defined eventually when CONFIG_CPUMASKS_OFFSTACK=y
so that won't compile.

Cheers,
Rusty.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-01-07  2:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-12-31  8:34 [PATCH 0/6] cpuset: convert to new cpumask API Li Zefan
2008-12-31  8:35 ` [PATCH 1/6] cpuset: remove on stack cpumask_t in cpuset_sprintf_cpulist() Li Zefan
2008-12-31  8:35   ` [PATCH 2/6] cpuset: remove on stack cpumask_t in cpuset_can_attach() Li Zefan
2008-12-31  8:36     ` [PATCH 3/6] cpuset: convert cpuset_attach() to use cpumask_var_t Li Zefan
2008-12-31  8:36       ` [PATCH 4/6] cpuset: don't allocate trial cpuset on stack Li Zefan
2008-12-31  8:37         ` [PATCH 5/6] cpuset: convert cpuset->cpus_allowed to cpumask_var_t Li Zefan
2008-12-31  8:37           ` [PATCH 6/6] cpuset: remove remaining pointers to cpumask_t Li Zefan
2009-01-05  7:46         ` [PATCH 4/6] cpuset: don't allocate trial cpuset on stack Andrew Morton
2009-01-05  9:13           ` Li Zefan
2009-01-05  7:38       ` [PATCH 3/6] cpuset: convert cpuset_attach() to use cpumask_var_t Andrew Morton
2009-01-05  8:47         ` Li Zefan
2009-01-05  9:01           ` Andrew Morton
2009-01-05  9:04             ` Li Zefan
2009-01-05  9:14               ` Andrew Morton
2009-01-05  9:21                 ` Li Zefan
2009-01-07  2:04             ` Rusty Russell [this message]
2009-01-07 16:39           ` Paul Menage
2008-12-31 11:56 ` [PATCH 0/6] cpuset: convert to new cpumask API Mike Travis
2008-12-31 13:26 ` Rusty Russell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200901071234.51646.rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
    --to=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lizf@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=menage@google.com \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=travis@sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox