From: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Mike Travis <travis@sgi.com>, Paul Menage <menage@google.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] cpuset: convert cpuset_attach() to use cpumask_var_t
Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 12:34:50 +1030 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200901071234.51646.rusty@rustcorp.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090105010147.bc42b655.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
On Monday 05 January 2009 19:31:47 Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Mon, 05 Jan 2009 16:47:21 +0800 Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com> wrote:
>
> > Allocate a global cpumask_var_t at boot, and use it in cpuset_attach(), so
> > we won't fail cpuset_attach().
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>
> > Acked-by: Mike Travis <travis@sgi.com>
> > ---
> > kernel/cpuset.c | 14 +++++++++-----
> > 1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/kernel/cpuset.c b/kernel/cpuset.c
> > index afa29cf..1e32e6b 100644
> > --- a/kernel/cpuset.c
> > +++ b/kernel/cpuset.c
> > @@ -1306,6 +1306,9 @@ static int fmeter_getrate(struct fmeter *fmp)
> > return val;
> > }
> >
> > +/* Protected by cgroup_lock */
> > +static cpumask_var_t cpus_attach;
> > +
> > /* Called by cgroups to determine if a cpuset is usable; cgroup_mutex held */
> > static int cpuset_can_attach(struct cgroup_subsys *ss,
> > struct cgroup *cont, struct task_struct *tsk)
> > @@ -1330,7 +1333,6 @@ static void cpuset_attach(struct cgroup_subsys *ss,
> > struct cgroup *cont, struct cgroup *oldcont,
> > struct task_struct *tsk)
> > {
> > - cpumask_t cpus;
> > nodemask_t from, to;
> > struct mm_struct *mm;
> > struct cpuset *cs = cgroup_cs(cont);
> > @@ -1338,13 +1340,13 @@ static void cpuset_attach(struct cgroup_subsys *ss,
> > int err;
> >
> > if (cs == &top_cpuset) {
> > - cpus = cpu_possible_map;
> > + cpumask_copy(cpus_attach, cpu_possible_mask);
> > } else {
> > mutex_lock(&callback_mutex);
> > - guarantee_online_cpus(cs, &cpus);
> > + guarantee_online_cpus(cs, cpus_attach);
> > mutex_unlock(&callback_mutex);
> > }
> > - err = set_cpus_allowed_ptr(tsk, &cpus);
> > + err = set_cpus_allowed_ptr(tsk, cpus_attach);
> > if (err)
> > return;
> >
> > @@ -1357,7 +1359,6 @@ static void cpuset_attach(struct cgroup_subsys *ss,
> > cpuset_migrate_mm(mm, &from, &to);
> > mmput(mm);
> > }
> > -
> > }
> >
> > /* The various types of files and directories in a cpuset file system */
> > @@ -1838,6 +1839,9 @@ int __init cpuset_init(void)
> > if (err < 0)
> > return err;
> >
> > + if (!alloc_cpumask_var(&cpus_attach, GFP_KERNEL))
> > + BUG();
> > +
> > number_of_cpusets = 1;
> > return 0;
> > }
>
> OK, that works.
>
> Do we need to dynamically allocate cpus_attach? Can we just do
>
> static cpumask_t cpus_attach;
Well, (1) we're deprecating the typedef, (2) we really want the NR_CPUS=16384
and nr_cpu_ids=4 case not to suck and this sets a bad example, but moreover
(3) struct cpumask won't be defined eventually when CONFIG_CPUMASKS_OFFSTACK=y
so that won't compile.
Cheers,
Rusty.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-01-07 2:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-12-31 8:34 [PATCH 0/6] cpuset: convert to new cpumask API Li Zefan
2008-12-31 8:35 ` [PATCH 1/6] cpuset: remove on stack cpumask_t in cpuset_sprintf_cpulist() Li Zefan
2008-12-31 8:35 ` [PATCH 2/6] cpuset: remove on stack cpumask_t in cpuset_can_attach() Li Zefan
2008-12-31 8:36 ` [PATCH 3/6] cpuset: convert cpuset_attach() to use cpumask_var_t Li Zefan
2008-12-31 8:36 ` [PATCH 4/6] cpuset: don't allocate trial cpuset on stack Li Zefan
2008-12-31 8:37 ` [PATCH 5/6] cpuset: convert cpuset->cpus_allowed to cpumask_var_t Li Zefan
2008-12-31 8:37 ` [PATCH 6/6] cpuset: remove remaining pointers to cpumask_t Li Zefan
2009-01-05 7:46 ` [PATCH 4/6] cpuset: don't allocate trial cpuset on stack Andrew Morton
2009-01-05 9:13 ` Li Zefan
2009-01-05 7:38 ` [PATCH 3/6] cpuset: convert cpuset_attach() to use cpumask_var_t Andrew Morton
2009-01-05 8:47 ` Li Zefan
2009-01-05 9:01 ` Andrew Morton
2009-01-05 9:04 ` Li Zefan
2009-01-05 9:14 ` Andrew Morton
2009-01-05 9:21 ` Li Zefan
2009-01-07 2:04 ` Rusty Russell [this message]
2009-01-07 16:39 ` Paul Menage
2008-12-31 11:56 ` [PATCH 0/6] cpuset: convert to new cpumask API Mike Travis
2008-12-31 13:26 ` Rusty Russell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200901071234.51646.rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--to=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lizf@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=menage@google.com \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=travis@sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox