From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
To: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@novell.com>
Cc: ccache@lists.samba.org, Theodore Tso <tytso@mit.edu>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@medozas.de>
Subject: Re: [REGRESSION] Recent change to kernel spikes out ccache/distcc
Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 21:06:46 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090107200646.GF4647@uranus.ravnborg.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4964C0A3.76E4.0078.0@novell.com>
On Wed, Jan 07, 2009 at 01:48:03PM +0000, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org> 07.01.09 14:23 >>>
> >On Wed, Jan 07, 2009 at 12:35:09PM +0000, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >> >>> Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org> 07.01.09 12:31 >>>
> >> >What is the gain/pain ratio here?
> >>
> >> Certainly depends on the pov - it reduces the kernel module (disk) image
> >> sizes quite a bit, so from a distro perspective its a move against the ever
> >> growing package sizes (and the disk space) hundreds or even thousands
> >> of modules require.
> >
> >The kernel modules seldom export anything so the benefit is minimal here.
>
> Not really, for highly modular distro kernels.
>
> >I did a 15 minutes hack to try ripping the .c -> .s -> .o stuff out.
>
> Looks good to me. In case you decide to revert the stuff for .29, I'll
> merge this into my patch.
As it stand now it:
1) breaks sparc32 build
2) causes regression with distcc/ccache use when MODVERSIONS are enabled
3) the concept is under discussion
So I will have to revert it somehow.
I will look into during a partial revert though as your patches had some stuff
in them I like to keep or which does not harm (genksyms change for instance).
>
> >Jan - I need some hard numbers to convince me that stripping the
> >__crc symbols is worth it.
>
> The on-disk size of the modules in my builds is reduced by about 5% with
> this patch (but I can't immediately tell how much of this is due to __crc_*
> vs. other symbol stripping).
But if only on-disk size is your primary concern then another patch
of Jan Engelhardt would be a bigger win:
build: install modules compressed
---
scripts/Makefile.modinst | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/scripts/Makefile.modinst b/scripts/Makefile.modinst
index efa5d94..c3421a1 100644
--- a/scripts/Makefile.modinst
+++ b/scripts/Makefile.modinst
@@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ __modinst: $(modules)
@:
quiet_cmd_modules_install = INSTALL $@
- cmd_modules_install = mkdir -p $(2); cp $@ $(2) ; $(mod_strip_cmd) \
$(2)/$(notdir $@)
+ cmd_modules_install = mkdir -p $(2); cp $@ $(2) ; \
$(mod_strip_cmd) $(2)/$(notdir $@); gzip -9f $(2)/$(notdir $@)
# Modules built outside the kernel source tree go into extra by default
INSTALL_MOD_DIR ?= extra
(cut'n'paste so will not apply direct)
It does not decrease the size of vmlinux but the > 1000 modules are compressed.
The patch will in some form be present in kbuild-next.git when I open up
for that.
Sam
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-01-07 20:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-01-06 15:15 [REGRESSION] Recent change to kernel spikes out ccache/distcc Theodore Ts'o
2009-01-06 15:29 ` Jan Beulich
2009-01-06 17:33 ` Theodore Tso
2009-01-06 17:48 ` Sam Ravnborg
2009-01-06 18:04 ` Theodore Tso
2009-01-07 8:50 ` Jan Beulich
2009-01-07 11:31 ` Sam Ravnborg
2009-01-07 12:35 ` Jan Beulich
2009-01-07 13:23 ` Sam Ravnborg
2009-01-07 13:48 ` Jan Beulich
2009-01-07 20:06 ` Sam Ravnborg [this message]
2009-01-08 19:16 ` Kyle McMartin
2009-01-12 14:06 ` Gilles Espinasse
2009-01-06 17:53 ` Sam Ravnborg
2009-01-06 16:26 ` David Miller
2009-01-06 18:12 ` Theodore Tso
2009-01-06 22:09 ` Sam Ravnborg
2009-01-07 4:33 ` Theodore Tso
2009-01-07 5:10 ` Al Viro
2009-01-07 8:49 ` Jan Beulich
2009-01-07 14:03 ` Al Viro
2009-01-07 14:28 ` Jan Beulich
2009-01-07 14:37 ` Al Viro
2009-01-07 14:40 ` Jan Beulich
2009-01-07 13:12 ` Theodore Tso
2009-01-07 13:39 ` Jan Beulich
2009-01-07 14:28 ` Theodore Tso
2009-01-07 14:39 ` Jan Beulich
2009-01-08 19:17 ` Dave Jones
2009-01-08 21:31 ` Theodore Tso
2009-01-11 21:48 ` Kyle McMartin
2009-01-11 22:11 ` Theodore Tso
2009-01-11 22:51 ` Theodore Tso
2009-01-11 22:55 ` Kyle McMartin
2009-01-14 17:16 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-01-15 9:11 ` Jan Beulich
2009-01-15 13:40 ` Theodore Tso
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090107200646.GF4647@uranus.ravnborg.org \
--to=sam@ravnborg.org \
--cc=ccache@lists.samba.org \
--cc=jbeulich@novell.com \
--cc=jengelh@medozas.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox