From: Mathieu Desnoyers <compudj@krystal.dyndns.org>
To: Zhaolei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: ltt-dev@lists.casi.polymtl.ca, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>, Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [ltt-dev] [PATCH 1/2] Make lttctl mount debugfs automatically
Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2009 22:30:22 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090109033021.GA25504@Krystal> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7C0A417AB5B84CDCB9A9484C4E13A08C@zhaoleiwin>
* Zhaolei (zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com) wrote:
> * From: "Mathieu Desnoyers" <compudj@krystal.dyndns.org>
> >* Zhaolei (zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com) wrote:
> >> * From: "Pierre-Marc Fournier" <pierre-marc.fournier@polymtl.ca>
> >> > Zhaolei wrote:
> >> >> lttctl need debugfs mounted,
> >> >> This patch make lttctl mount debugfs automatically when it is not mounted.
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> > Isn't having a utility such as lttctl mount filesystems against standard
> >> > unix semantics? Can you give an example of another standard command that
> >> > uses a filesystem and that tries to mount it if it isn't already
> >> > mounted?
> >> Hello, Pierre-Marc,
> >>
> >> I can give a an example.
> >> It is SystemTap.
> >>
> >
> > No offence, but can you find an example which is not explicitly
> > described as "bad taste" example by many people in the Linux kernel
> > community ?
> Hello, Mathieu
>
> I can't find another example of mounting debugfs automatically.
> Maybe it is because debugfs is not widely used as others such as sysfs and
> procfs.
>
> sysfs and procfs are mounted in boot, and user-mode tools need not check and
> mount then again. But debugfs is not too useful for normal user who just use
> linux to edit text and browse internet, so mount debugfs in boot period is not
> a good idea.
> So, IMHO, debugfs's usage is not same as sysfs and procfs, we need not mount
> sysfs and procfs in user-mode program, but maybe it is different for debugfs.
>
> On the other hand, I also understand your opinion, mount a fs in program looks
> strange(but can make user easy to use...), so you can feel free to ignore this
> patch.
> Same with [PATCH 2/2] Make lttctl load ltt-trace-control module automatically.
>
I wonder what's Greg KH (and others) opinion about this ?
Mathieu
> Regards
> Zhaolei
>
> >
> > Mathieu
> >
> >> Regards
> >> Zhaolei
> >>
> >> > My guess is we should warn about the filesystem not being
> >> > mounted, but not try to call mount() directly.
> >> >
> >> >> Little cleanup also done(combile 2 getdebugfsmntdir() into one).
> >> >>
> >> >> Applies on top of ltt-control-0.63-03012009.
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> ltt-dev mailing list
> >> ltt-dev@lists.casi.polymtl.ca
> >> http://lists.casi.polymtl.ca/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ltt-dev
> >>
> >
> > --
> > Mathieu Desnoyers
> > OpenPGP key fingerprint: 8CD5 52C3 8E3C 4140 715F BA06 3F25 A8FE 3BAE 9A68
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________
> ltt-dev mailing list
> ltt-dev@lists.casi.polymtl.ca
> http://lists.casi.polymtl.ca/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ltt-dev
>
--
Mathieu Desnoyers
OpenPGP key fingerprint: 8CD5 52C3 8E3C 4140 715F BA06 3F25 A8FE 3BAE 9A68
next parent reply other threads:[~2009-01-09 3:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <49646208.7070607@cn.fujitsu.com>
[not found] ` <4964BA2B.30200@polymtl.ca>
[not found] ` <AA3F776E5F6246859F1978B7C7CF1919@zhaoleiwin>
[not found] ` <20090108144430.GA3778@Krystal>
[not found] ` <7C0A417AB5B84CDCB9A9484C4E13A08C@zhaoleiwin>
2009-01-09 3:30 ` Mathieu Desnoyers [this message]
2009-01-13 23:54 ` [ltt-dev] [PATCH 1/2] Make lttctl mount debugfs automatically Greg KH
2009-01-14 2:02 ` Josh Boyer
2009-01-14 5:16 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2009-01-14 5:54 ` Greg KH
2009-01-15 1:41 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090109033021.GA25504@Krystal \
--to=compudj@krystal.dyndns.org \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=gregkh@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ltt-dev@lists.casi.polymtl.ca \
--cc=zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox