From: Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de>
To: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: Stefan Richter <stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de>,
linux1394-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@vrfy.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jay Fenlason <fenlason@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH post 2.6.28] firewire: core: fix sleep in atomic context due to driver core change
Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 13:54:23 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090109215423.GA7869@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090109211718.48a7a4a6@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
On Fri, Jan 09, 2009 at 09:17:18PM +0000, Alan Cox wrote:
> On Fri, 9 Jan 2009 20:49:37 +0100 (CET)
> Stefan Richter <stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de> wrote:
>
> > Due to commit 2831fe6f9cc4e16c103504ee09a47a084297c0f3, "driver core:
> > create a private portion of struct device", device_initialize() can no
> > longer be called from atomic contexts.
>
> I don't see why this is neccessary or appropriate - the original commit
> needs to be pulled and the private area allocation rethought.
Ugh, I think you're right. I'll revert this (and all of the patches in
the series that were needed to get this working properly), and redo the
patch set, first making device_initialize() able to fail, and auditing
all callers to make sure it's not being called in atomic context.
At first glance, I think it's only firewire that is doing this in atomic
context, so Stefan, I wouldn't mind seeing your patch go in as-is just
to make things simpler overall.
I'll go make up the patchset and send them to Linus...
thanks,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-01-09 21:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-01-09 18:35 post 2.6.28 regression: device_initialize() now sleeps, and may fail without recovery strategy Stefan Richter
2009-01-09 19:49 ` [PATCH post 2.6.28] firewire: core: fix sleep in atomic context due to driver core change Stefan Richter
2009-01-09 21:17 ` Alan Cox
2009-01-09 21:54 ` Greg KH [this message]
2009-01-09 22:28 ` [git pull] FireWire fix Stefan Richter
2009-01-09 20:56 ` post 2.6.28 regression: device_initialize() now sleeps, and may fail without recovery strategy Greg KH
2009-01-09 21:13 ` Stefan Richter
2009-01-09 21:20 ` Stefan Richter
2009-01-09 21:34 ` Greg KH
2009-01-09 21:30 ` Greg KH
2009-01-09 21:40 ` Stefan Richter
2009-01-09 21:24 ` Alan Cox
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090109215423.GA7869@suse.de \
--to=gregkh@suse.de \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=fenlason@redhat.com \
--cc=kay.sievers@vrfy.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux1394-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox