Re: [PATCH] add b+tree library

Johannes Berg
2009-01-10T20:21:30Z

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 559 bytes --]

On Sat, 2009-01-10 at 20:41 +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
> Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net> writes:
>
> > Also, to elaborate on that answer, I'm going to use this as a sort of
> > hash table for wireless, where it ensures better scalability than a pure
> > hashtable from quiet environments (say wireless off on an airplane) to
> > your wireless test lab (100+ access points)
>
> Is there any particular reason you can't use the standard rbtrees
> for that?

It just seemed like a lot of overhead, no particular reason I guess.

johannes

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]