From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Dieter Ries <clip2@gmx.de>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: travis@sgi.com, rusty@rustcorp.com.au, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.29-rc1 does not boot
Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 20:02:18 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090111190218.GA18651@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <496A3F62.8090902@gmx.de>
* Dieter Ries <clip2@gmx.de> wrote:
> Bisected it:
>
> ####################################################################
> 7503bfbae89eba07b46441a5d1594647f6b8ab7d is first bad commit
> commit 7503bfbae89eba07b46441a5d1594647f6b8ab7d
> Author: Mike Travis <travis@sgi.com>
> Date: Sun Jan 4 05:18:09 2009 -0800
>
> cpumask: use work_on_cpu in acpi-cpufreq.c for drv_read and drv_write
>
> Impact: use new cpumask API to reduce stack usage
thanks, this is very helpful!
Mike, most of the work_on_cpu() patches you did so far were rather
problematic. Especially something like cpufreq can run rather early during
bootup or during suspend/resume, so i'm not sure it's correct to rely on
keventd for it.
I dont see anything particularly wrong in the commit itself - but
obviously it causes this boot hang - if the bug is not found we'll revert
it .
Also, this bit in get_cur_val():
+ if (unlikely(!alloc_cpumask_var(&cmd.mask, GFP_KERNEL)))
+ return 0;
how is that supposed to work? If we fail to allocate a cpumask we just
ignore the call silently? That cannot be right. (but has no connection to
this boot problem)
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-01-11 19:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-01-11 14:55 2.6.29-rc1 does not boot Dieter Ries
2009-01-11 15:19 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-11 15:30 ` Dieter Ries
2009-01-11 15:35 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-11 15:41 ` Dieter Ries
2009-01-11 18:50 ` Dieter Ries
2009-01-11 19:02 ` Mike Travis
2009-01-11 19:30 ` Dieter Ries
2009-01-12 10:00 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-12 17:53 ` Mike Travis
2009-01-12 18:55 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-15 0:54 ` Rusty Russell
2009-01-11 19:02 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2009-01-11 19:14 ` Mike Travis
2009-01-11 23:19 ` Mike Travis
2009-01-12 1:01 ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-01-12 11:22 ` Maciej Rutecki
2009-01-12 11:26 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-12 11:28 ` Maciej Rutecki
2009-01-12 12:10 ` Dieter Ries
2009-01-12 12:21 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-12 16:37 ` Dieter Ries
2009-01-12 18:59 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-13 4:45 ` Michal Jaegermann
2009-01-12 17:22 ` 2.6.29-rc1 does not boot and fails to resume Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-01-14 1:16 ` 2.6.29-rc1 does not boot Rusty Russell
2009-01-14 11:30 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-14 12:47 ` Dieter Ries
2009-01-15 20:01 ` Mike Travis
2009-01-15 21:03 ` Dieter Ries
2009-01-15 21:48 ` Maciej Rutecki
2009-01-15 21:54 ` Mike Travis
2009-01-15 23:04 ` Maciej Rutecki
2009-01-15 23:31 ` Mike Travis
2009-01-15 21:54 ` Mike Travis
2009-01-15 23:02 ` Dieter Ries
2009-01-15 23:30 ` Mike Travis
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090111190218.GA18651@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=clip2@gmx.de \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=travis@sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox