From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753846AbZALIht (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Jan 2009 03:37:49 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751858AbZALIhk (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Jan 2009 03:37:40 -0500 Received: from e28smtp05.in.ibm.com ([59.145.155.5]:37935 "EHLO e28smtp05.in.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751853AbZALIhk (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Jan 2009 03:37:40 -0500 Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 14:07:34 +0530 From: Kamalesh Babulal To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, sfr@canb.auug.org.au, benh@kernel.crashing.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, mel@csn.ul.ie Subject: Re: [BUG] 2.6.28-git-4 - powerpc - kernel expection 'c01 at .kernel_thread' Message-ID: <20090112083734.GB8409@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Reply-To: Kamalesh Babulal References: <20090102125752.GA5743@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <200901110108.20848.rjw@sisk.pl> <20090112072132.GA8409@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <200901120907.20418.rjw@sisk.pl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200901120907.20418.rjw@sisk.pl> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Rafael J. Wysocki [2009-01-12 09:07:19]: > On Monday 12 January 2009, Kamalesh Babulal wrote: > > * Rafael J. Wysocki [2009-01-11 01:08:19]: > > > > > On Friday 02 January 2009, Kamalesh Babulal wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > 2.6.28-git4 kernel drops to xmon with kernel expection. Similar kernel > > > > expection was seen next-20081230 and next-20081231 and was reported > > > > earlier at http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/12/31/157 > > > > > > Is this a regression from 2.6.27? > > > > > > Rafael > > > > > > > This is not a regression from 2.6.27, this expection was first seen > > next-20081230 patches and then was introduced into 2.6.28-git4 and is > > reproducible with 2.6.28-rc1 kernel. > > Presumably you meant 2.6.29-rc1 ? In which case it would be a regression from > 2.6.28 . Please confirm. > > Thanks, > Rafael > sorry, I meant it was introduced in 2.6.28-git4 and is still reproducible with 2.6.29-rc1. -- Thanks & Regards, Kamalesh Babulal, Linux Technology Center, IBM, ISTL.