From: "Rémi Denis-Courmont" <rdenis@simphalempin.com>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
Cc: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu, Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Michael Stone <michael@laptop.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: RFC: Network privilege separation.
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 22:30:25 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200901122230.25976.rdenis@simphalempin.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090112203931.GD23848@one.firstfloor.org>
Le lundi 12 janvier 2009 22:39:31 Andi Kleen, vous avez écrit :
> > What's the point of writing a parser (that could also have bugs) when the
>
> Sorry you lost me. What do you mean with parser here?
>
> > kernel can do it?
>
> And what does it have to do with the kernel?
The parser at the other end of the pipe. The more intricate the over-the-pipe
protocol is, the more likely it is to be buggy and the security scheme to
break.
> > A normal DVD would be over 30 megabytes per seconds once decoded, just
> > for the
>
> On many modern systems 30MB/s copies is nothing ... Also in this
> case they tend to be cache hot, which makes them much cheaper.
> Yes it would be somewhat slower, but if it avoids a couple of security
> updates that would be probably worth it.
If codecs did not care about performance, they'd be written in some high-level
language that could easily be sandboxed by its own VM.
As the guy who's been dealing with VLC security issues for the past two years,
I have to say, I am in no way interested in SECCOMP as it _currently_ is.
--
Rémi Denis-Courmont
http://www.remlab.net/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-01-12 20:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-01-07 5:48 RFC: Network privilege separation Michael Stone
2009-01-07 5:48 ` [PATCH] Security: Implement and document RLIMIT_NETWORK Michael Stone
2009-01-07 11:47 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2009-01-07 16:52 ` Rémi Denis-Courmont
2009-01-07 17:48 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2009-01-07 20:54 ` Rémi Denis-Courmont
2009-01-07 21:42 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2009-01-07 18:35 ` C. Scott Ananian
2009-01-07 19:02 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2009-01-07 19:39 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2009-01-07 21:07 ` Michael Stone
2009-01-07 21:59 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2009-01-08 0:56 ` Michael Stone
2009-01-08 4:27 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2009-01-08 1:22 ` James Morris
2009-01-08 3:34 ` Michael Stone
2009-01-07 21:10 ` RFC: Network privilege separation Andi Kleen
2009-01-08 2:31 ` Michael Stone
2009-01-08 3:10 ` Andi Kleen
2009-01-08 4:51 ` Michael Stone
2009-01-08 5:41 ` Andi Kleen
2009-01-08 7:05 ` Oliver Hartkopp
2009-01-08 7:52 ` david
2009-01-08 10:43 ` Alan Cox
2009-01-12 18:44 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2009-01-12 19:09 ` Bryan Donlan
2009-01-12 19:43 ` Andi Kleen
2009-01-12 19:47 ` Rémi Denis-Courmont
2009-01-12 20:14 ` Andi Kleen
2009-01-12 20:15 ` Rémi Denis-Courmont
2009-01-12 20:27 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2009-01-12 20:39 ` Andi Kleen
2009-01-12 20:30 ` Rémi Denis-Courmont [this message]
2009-01-12 20:55 ` Andi Kleen
2009-01-12 20:47 ` Rémi Denis-Courmont
2009-01-12 21:50 ` Andi Kleen
2009-01-13 8:06 ` Rémi Denis-Courmont
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-01-08 12:08 Herbert Xu
2009-01-08 12:10 Herbert Xu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200901122230.25976.rdenis@simphalempin.com \
--to=rdenis@simphalempin.com \
--cc=Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=michael@laptop.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox