public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Frederik Deweerdt <frederik.deweerdt@xprog.eu>
To: Mike Travis <travis@sgi.com>
Cc: mingo@elte.hu, andi@firstfloor.org, tglx@linutronix.de,
	hpa@zytor.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] tlb flush_data: replace per_cpu with an array
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 00:51:56 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090112235156.GC10720@gambetta> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <496BCA21.2010709@sgi.com>

On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 02:54:25PM -0800, Mike Travis wrote:
> Frederik Deweerdt wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > On x86_64 flush tlb data is stored in per_cpu variables. This is
> > unnecessary because only the first NUM_INVALIDATE_TLB_VECTORS entries
> > are accessed.
> > This patch aims at making the code less confusing (there's nothing
> > really "per_cpu") by using a plain array. It also would save some memory
> > on most distros out there (Ubuntu x86_64 has NR_CPUS=64 by default).
> > 
> > Regards,
> > Frederik
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Frederik Deweerdt <frederik.deweerdt@xprog.eu>
> 
> Here is the net change in memory usage with this patch on a allyesconfig
> with NR_CPUS=4096.
Yes, this point wrt. memory was based on my flawed understanding of how
per_cpu actually allocates the data. There is however 1) a confusing use
of per_cpu removed, 2) faster access to the flush data.

> 
> ====== Data (-l 500)
> 
>     1 - initial
>     2 - change-flush-tlb
> 
>   .1.    .2.  .delta.
>     0   5120   +5120      .  flush_state(.bss)
> 
> ====== Sections (-l 500)
> 
>         .1.    .2.  .delta.
>    12685496 12693688       +8192 +0.06%  .bss
>     1910176  1909408        -768 -0.04%  .data.percpu
> 
I get :
Initial
 size ./arch/x86/kernel/tlb_64.o
   text	   data	    bss	    dec	    hex	filename
   1667	    136	      8	   1811	    713	./arch/x86/kernel/tlb_64.o

After
 size ./arch/x86/kernel/tlb_64.o 
   text	   data	    bss	    dec	    hex	filename
   1598	      8	   1088	   2694	    a86	./arch/x86/kernel/tlb_64.o

    -69    -128   +1080    +883

But I'm not sure those numbers are that relevant, as the percpu part
will be allocated at runtime.

Regards,
Frederik

> > 
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/tlb_64.c b/arch/x86/kernel/tlb_64.c
> > index f8be6f1..c177a1f 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/tlb_64.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/tlb_64.c
> > @@ -33,7 +33,7 @@
> >   *	To avoid global state use 8 different call vectors.
> >   *	Each CPU uses a specific vector to trigger flushes on other
> >   *	CPUs. Depending on the received vector the target CPUs look into
> > - *	the right per cpu variable for the flush data.
> > + *	the right array slot for the flush data.
> >   *
> >   *	With more than 8 CPUs they are hashed to the 8 available
> >   *	vectors. The limited global vector space forces us to this right now.
> > @@ -54,7 +54,7 @@ union smp_flush_state {
> >  /* State is put into the per CPU data section, but padded
> >     to a full cache line because other CPUs can access it and we don't
> >     want false sharing in the per cpu data segment. */
> > -static DEFINE_PER_CPU(union smp_flush_state, flush_state);
> > +static union smp_flush_state flush_state[NUM_INVALIDATE_TLB_VECTORS];
> >  
> >  /*
> >   * We cannot call mmdrop() because we are in interrupt context,
> > @@ -129,7 +129,7 @@ asmlinkage void smp_invalidate_interrupt(struct pt_regs *regs)
> >  	 * Use that to determine where the sender put the data.
> >  	 */
> >  	sender = ~regs->orig_ax - INVALIDATE_TLB_VECTOR_START;
> > -	f = &per_cpu(flush_state, sender);
> > +	f = &flush_state[sender];
> >  
> >  	if (!cpu_isset(cpu, f->flush_cpumask))
> >  		goto out;
> > @@ -169,7 +169,7 @@ void native_flush_tlb_others(const cpumask_t *cpumaskp, struct mm_struct *mm,
> >  
> >  	/* Caller has disabled preemption */
> >  	sender = smp_processor_id() % NUM_INVALIDATE_TLB_VECTORS;
> > -	f = &per_cpu(flush_state, sender);
> > +	f = &flush_state[sender];
> >  
> >  	/*
> >  	 * Could avoid this lock when
> > @@ -205,8 +205,8 @@ static int __cpuinit init_smp_flush(void)
> >  {
> >  	int i;
> >  
> > -	for_each_possible_cpu(i)
> > -		spin_lock_init(&per_cpu(flush_state, i).tlbstate_lock);
> > +	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(flush_state); i++)
> > +		spin_lock_init(&flush_state[i].tlbstate_lock);
> >  
> >  	return 0;
> >  }
> > --
> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> > More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> > Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2009-01-12 23:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-01-12 21:35 [patch] tlb flush_data: replace per_cpu with an array Frederik Deweerdt
2009-01-12 21:46 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-12 21:57 ` Andi Kleen
2009-01-12 22:10   ` Frederik Deweerdt
2009-01-12 22:32     ` Andi Kleen
2009-01-12 22:50       ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-12 22:40   ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-12 22:59     ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-01-13  2:43     ` Andi Kleen
2009-01-13 12:28       ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-12 22:34 ` Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2009-01-12 23:00   ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-12 23:09     ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-13  2:14     ` Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2009-01-13 12:00     ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-01-13 12:33       ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-13 18:13         ` Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2009-01-13 18:34           ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-13 18:42             ` Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2009-01-14  7:31               ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-15  7:15                 ` Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2009-01-14  9:08       ` Andi Kleen
2009-01-14 14:41         ` Frederik Deweerdt
2009-01-14 15:20           ` Andi Kleen
2009-01-14 15:10             ` Frederik Deweerdt
2009-01-12 22:54 ` Mike Travis
2009-01-12 23:51   ` Frederik Deweerdt [this message]
2009-01-12 23:57     ` Mike Travis
2009-01-13  0:01       ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-13  3:36         ` Andi Kleen
2009-01-13 12:14           ` Ingo Molnar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090112235156.GC10720@gambetta \
    --to=frederik.deweerdt@xprog.eu \
    --cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=travis@sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox