From: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: new barrier warnings in 2.6.29-rc1
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 09:42:29 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090113084229.GL30821@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <496C0915.6000107@kernel.org>
On Tue, Jan 13 2009, Tejun Heo wrote:
> (cc'ing Jens)
> Hello,
>
> Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > Whever a filesystem submits a bio with the barrier flag set but
> > the underlying hardware doesn't support it we now get errors in
> > the form of:
> >
> > [ 3046.442629] end_request: I/O error, dev vdb, sector 0
> >
> > since commit a7384677b2f4cd40948fd7ce024ba5e1821444ba which removed
> > the early check on the queue capabilities in __make_request. I
> > think this message is pretty annoying and confusing for the user
> > as the filesystems already have more descriptive warnings, e.g. for
> > XFS:
> >
> > [ 3046.455478] Filesystem "vdb": Disabling barriers, trial barrier write failed
>
> I think the right thing to do is setting REQ_QUIET on the trial
> barrier request.
It would surely work, but XFS doesn't really have a way to do that. Then
we would have to add a bio quiet flag and inherit that.
I kind of liked the old behaviour. What about something like the below?
diff --git a/block/blk-core.c b/block/blk-core.c
index a824e49..eddba4a 100644
--- a/block/blk-core.c
+++ b/block/blk-core.c
@@ -1448,6 +1448,11 @@ static inline void __generic_make_request(struct bio *bio)
err = -EOPNOTSUPP;
goto end_io;
}
+ if (bio_barrier(bio) && bio_has_data(bio) &&
+ (q->next_ordered == QUEUE_ORDERED_NONE)) {
+ err = -EOPNOTSUPP;
+ goto end_io;
+ }
ret = q->make_request_fn(q, bio);
} while (ret);
--
Jens Axboe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-01-13 8:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-01-12 15:46 new barrier warnings in 2.6.29-rc1 Christoph Hellwig
2009-01-13 3:23 ` Tejun Heo
2009-01-13 8:42 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2009-01-13 10:40 ` Tejun Heo
2009-01-13 10:45 ` Jens Axboe
2009-01-18 22:15 ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-01-19 20:19 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090113084229.GL30821@kernel.dk \
--to=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox