From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: dsilvers@simtec.co.uk
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] GPIOLIB: Allow GPIOs to be named
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 13:14:17 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090113131417.fe36d9bb.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1231504690.8511.8.camel@petitemort>
On Fri, 09 Jan 2009 12:38:10 +0000
Daniel Silverstone <dsilvers@simtec.co.uk> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> During recent work for a customer, we needed to export named GPIOs to
> userland for them. I investigated various possible ways of doing so, and
> eventually reached the conclusion that there were two reasonable ways.
> The first required adding the ability to register symbolic links for
> classes in sysfs. So that I could have /sys/class/gpio/my-named-gpio be
> a symlink to /sys/class/gpio/gpio0 or similar.
>
> However, I felt that would be a touch invasive and so I looked for a
> simpler way and decided that simply allowing the gpio_chip struct to
> carry an optional names array would be best (and much less invasive).
>
> I was unable to find anything in MAINTAINERS or at the top of gpiolib.c
> to indicate who to CC, hence sending this only to the list. Below is a
> patch against 2150edc6c5cf00f7adb54538b9ea2a3e9cedca3f.
gpio core is developed/maintained by David Brownell. Who owes us a
MAINTAINERS update ;)
> I'd appreciate comments and ideas for how to do this better, or if it is
> acceptable, I'd love to see it merged.
>
> ...
>
> GPIOLIB: Allow GPIOs to be named
>
> This patch allows GPIOs in GPIOLIB chips to be named. This name is
> then used when the GPIO is exported to sysfs, although it could be
> used elsewhere if deemed useful.
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Silverstone <dsilvers@simtec.co.uk>
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
> index 35e7aea..de2f114 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
> @@ -438,6 +438,7 @@ int gpio_export(unsigned gpio, bool direction_may_change)
> unsigned long flags;
> struct gpio_desc *desc;
> int status = -EINVAL;
> + char *ioname = NULL;
>
> /* can't export until sysfs is available ... */
> if (!gpio_class.p) {
> @@ -461,11 +462,14 @@ int gpio_export(unsigned gpio, bool direction_may_change)
> }
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&gpio_lock, flags);
>
> + if (desc->chip->names && desc->chip->names[gpio - desc->chip->base])
> + ioname = desc->chip->names[gpio - desc->chip->base];
> +
> if (status == 0) {
> struct device *dev;
>
> dev = device_create(&gpio_class, desc->chip->dev, MKDEV(0, 0),
> - desc, "gpio%d", gpio);
> + desc, ioname ? ioname : "gpio%d", gpio);
> if (dev) {
> if (direction_may_change)
> status = sysfs_create_group(&dev->kobj,
> @@ -513,6 +517,7 @@ void gpio_unexport(unsigned gpio)
> mutex_lock(&sysfs_lock);
>
> desc = &gpio_desc[gpio];
> +
> if (test_bit(FLAG_EXPORT, &desc->flags)) {
> struct device *dev = NULL;
>
> diff --git a/include/asm-generic/gpio.h b/include/asm-generic/gpio.h
> index 81797ec..d6c379d 100644
> --- a/include/asm-generic/gpio.h
> +++ b/include/asm-generic/gpio.h
> @@ -55,6 +55,10 @@ struct module;
> * handled is (base + ngpio - 1).
> * @can_sleep: flag must be set iff get()/set() methods sleep, as they
> * must while accessing GPIO expander chips over I2C or SPI
> + * @names: if set, must be an array of strings to use as alternative
> + * names for the GPIOs in this chip. Any entry in the array
> + * may be NULL if there is no alias for the GPIO, however the
> + * array must be @ngpio entries long.
> *
> * A gpio_chip can help platforms abstract various sources of GPIOs so
> * they can all be accessed through a common programing interface.
> @@ -92,6 +96,7 @@ struct gpio_chip {
> struct gpio_chip *chip);
> int base;
> u16 ngpio;
> + char **names;
> unsigned can_sleep:1;
> unsigned exported:1;
> };
>
Well it's nice and simple.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-01-13 21:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-01-09 12:38 [PATCH] GPIOLIB: Allow GPIOs to be named Daniel Silverstone
2009-01-13 21:14 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2009-03-05 12:27 ` Daniel Silverstone
2009-03-13 9:43 ` Daniel Silverstone
2009-03-25 14:08 ` Daniel Silverstone
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090113131417.fe36d9bb.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=david-b@pacbell.net \
--cc=dsilvers@simtec.co.uk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox