From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756930AbZAMQmu (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Jan 2009 11:42:50 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753671AbZAMQml (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Jan 2009 11:42:41 -0500 Received: from mx2.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.151.9]:48045 "EHLO mx2.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752735AbZAMQmk (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Jan 2009 11:42:40 -0500 Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 17:42:27 +0100 From: Ingo Molnar To: Mike Travis Cc: Yinghai Lu , Rusty Russell , LKML Subject: Re: [PULL]: please pull changes for tip/cpus4096 Message-ID: <20090113164227.GA28034@elte.hu> References: <496BF1DC.2080009@sgi.com> <20090113151336.GA5431@elte.hu> <496CB0D2.2010300@sgi.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <496CB0D2.2010300@sgi.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean X-ELTE-SpamScore: -1.5 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-1.5 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.2.3 -1.5 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Mike Travis wrote: > Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Mike Travis wrote: > > > >> Hi Ingo, > >> > >> This is the same as the previous pull request except that I added > >> Yinghai's vast improvement to probing for nr_irqs. Big difference in > >> runtime memory allocated. > > > > before moving on, we first need to fix all pending regressions. Such as > > some MAXSMP fallout from the cpufreq changes: > > Ahh, ok, was this in my inbox already? yes. Also, we first need to fix all regressions (such as the irq_desc affinity fallout) before piling up any new stuff. With a rolling upgrade there's never any point of stability, and bisectability suffers as well. Ingo