From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: reif@earthlink.net, sparclinux-owner@vger.kernel.org,
mingo@elte.hu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: sparc32 compile error: redefinition of ‘smp_call_function_single’
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 18:42:39 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090113184239.e6b6e68e.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090113.181039.185575172.davem@davemloft.net>
On Tue, 13 Jan 2009 18:10:39 -0800 (PST) David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> wrote:
> From: Robert Reif <reif@earthlink.net>
> Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 20:40:04 -0500
>
> > Todays git produces this compile error on sparc32:
> >
> > kernel/up.c:10: error: redefinition of ___smp_call_function_single___
> > /usr/src/sparc32/linux-2.6/arch/sparc/include/asm/smp_32.h:78: error: previous definition of ___smp_call_function_single___ was here
>
> Andrew, are you sure that Makefile condition for compiling
> up.o is correct?
you give me grounds for now being ;)
> ifeq ($(CONFIG_USE_GENERIC_SMP_HELPERS),y)
> obj-y += smp.o
> else
> obj-y += up.o
> endif
>
> If an arch doesn't use generic SMP helpers, there is no way
> we should compile up.c into the tree when SMP.
>
How's about this?
--- a/kernel/Makefile~a
+++ a/kernel/Makefile
@@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_GENERIC_ISA_DMA) += dma.o
ifeq ($(CONFIG_USE_GENERIC_SMP_HELPERS),y)
obj-y += smp.o
else
-obj-y += up.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_SMP) += up.o
endif
obj-$(CONFIG_SMP) += spinlock.o
obj-$(CONFIG_DEBUG_SPINLOCK) += spinlock.o
_
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-01-14 2:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <496D4274.6000304@earthlink.net>
2009-01-14 2:10 ` sparc32 compile error: redefinition of ‘smp_call_function_single’ David Miller
2009-01-14 2:42 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2009-01-14 2:45 ` Andrew Morton
2009-01-14 3:38 ` Robert Reif
2009-01-14 7:59 ` Andrew Morton
2009-01-14 15:32 ` Sam Ravnborg
2009-01-14 18:25 ` Andrew Morton
2009-01-14 20:08 ` Sam Ravnborg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090113184239.e6b6e68e.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=reif@earthlink.net \
--cc=sparclinux-owner@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox