From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755607AbZANGj3 (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Jan 2009 01:39:29 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752377AbZANGjQ (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Jan 2009 01:39:16 -0500 Received: from mail-ew0-f17.google.com ([209.85.219.17]:55376 "EHLO mail-ew0-f17.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752323AbZANGjP (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Jan 2009 01:39:15 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=vUXLXABdp5dpKpH1DOPvQJjLvRwxDfIQDodcpykRXM7Iy0VzHd3JoSxpFkOVFPA5Ab F3BVnNJFF2+PFtMwdhrvs5S0ItfTzRNX7Kr+zV++HRVh5YLuq0XyBxvEJN9dHD2GOepm mrL/dFhXAc7bxemh9Km2FldA00FPkAK9O2j7w= Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 06:39:09 +0000 From: Jarek Poplawski To: Chris Caputo Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Badalian Vyacheslav , Denys Fedoryschenko , Peter Zijlstra Subject: Re: deadlocks if use htb Message-ID: <20090114063909.GA4234@ff.dom.local> References: <20081010090426.GA6054@ff.dom.local> <20081010095129.GB6054@ff.dom.local> <48F6FB3E.7060903@bigtelecom.ru> <20081016084027.GA17632@ff.dom.local> <48FEC302.5090707@bigtelecom.ru> <20081022070200.GB4178@ff.dom.local> <493FDCD4.5020108@bigtelecom.ru> <20081218081737.GA8416@ff.dom.local> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 02:43:13AM +0000, Chris Caputo wrote: ... > Per Jarek's suggestion in bugzilla, I ran 2.6.28 plus Peter Zijlstra's > "hrtimer: removing all ur callback modes" patches dated 2008-11-25, > 2008-12-04 and 2008-12-08. Uptime was 2 days 22 hours before I hit what > appears to be an unrelated bug related to the IPv6 FIB. (Separately > reported with subject 'panic with 2.6.28 while doing "ip -6 route"'.) Chris, this is a very good news, thanks for testing this! Peter, great work! IMHO these patches should go to the stable (at least 2.6.28). Thanks, Jarek P.