From: Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>
To: Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@ens-lyon.org>,
Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com, linux-input@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Re (hello?): [PATCH] Let keyboard notifiers modify key codes
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 08:40:44 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090115074044.GA1599@ucw.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090109214357.GH5073@const.famille.thibault.fr>
On Fri 2009-01-09 22:43:57, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Alan Cox, le Fri 09 Jan 2009 21:35:55 +0000, a écrit :
> > Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@ens-lyon.org> wrote:
> >
> > > Came somebody have a look at this? The need is real, the only question
> > > that comes to my mind is whether notifiers are allowed to modify the
> > > param they are given. Since they are not marked const, I'd guess it'd
> > > be ok?
> >
> > The notifier code doesn't care.
>
> I know, but I'm asking about current practice.
>
> > > Make kbd_keycode() read param.value after calling the keyboard notification
> > > chain, to let the callee change the translation on the fly. This for instance
> > > permits to remap the physical positions of the keys independently of the
> > > configured keymap, for e.g. single-handed people.
> >
> > Surely that is just a new keymap ?
>
> No. That would mean a lot of keymapSSS. Doing it the keymap way
> would require to have us, us-revert-left, us-revert-right, en-uk,
> uk-revert-left, uk-revert-right, etc. I really don't like that approach,
> thus the "independently of the configured keymap".
...and that is ok if you autogenerate those keymaps, right?
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-01-16 19:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-01-07 0:58 [PATCH] Let keyboard notifiers modify key codes Samuel Thibault
2009-01-09 21:23 ` Re (hello?): " Samuel Thibault
2009-01-09 21:35 ` Alan Cox
2009-01-09 21:43 ` Samuel Thibault
2009-01-09 22:01 ` Alan Cox
2009-01-09 22:23 ` Samuel Thibault
2009-01-12 22:36 ` Derek Fawcus
2009-01-12 22:51 ` Samuel Thibault
2009-01-13 1:06 ` Derek Fawcus
2009-01-13 1:45 ` Samuel Thibault
2009-01-15 7:40 ` Pavel Machek [this message]
2009-01-16 19:36 ` Samuel Thibault
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090115074044.GA1599@ucw.cz \
--to=pavel@suse.cz \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=samuel.thibault@ens-lyon.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox