[PATCH -tip] time-sched.c: tick_nohz_update_jiffies should be static

[PATCH -tip] time-sched.c: tick_nohz_update_jiffies should be static

[Jaswinder Singh Rajput]

Impact: cleanup, reduce kernel size a bit, avoid sparse warning

Fixes sparse warning:
 kernel/time/tick-sched.c:137:6: warning: symbol 'tick_nohz_update_jiffies' was not declared. Should it be static?

Signed-off-by: Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinderrajput@gmail.com>
---
 kernel/time/tick-sched.c |    2 +-
 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/time/tick-sched.c b/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
index 1b6c05b..d3f1ef4 100644
--- a/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
+++ b/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
@@ -134,7 +134,7 @@ __setup("nohz=", setup_tick_nohz);
  * value. We do this unconditionally on any cpu, as we don't know whether the
  * cpu, which has the update task assigned is in a long sleep.
  */
-void tick_nohz_update_jiffies(void)
+static void tick_nohz_update_jiffies(void)
 {
 	int cpu = smp_processor_id();
 	struct tick_sched *ts = &per_cpu(tick_cpu_sched, cpu);
-- 
1.6.0.6

Re: [PATCH -tip] time-sched.c: tick_nohz_update_jiffies should be static

[Ingo Molnar]

* Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinder@infradead.org> wrote:

> Impact: cleanup, reduce kernel size a bit, avoid sparse warning
> 
> Fixes sparse warning:
>  kernel/time/tick-sched.c:137:6: warning: symbol 'tick_nohz_update_jiffies' was not declared. Should it be static?
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinderrajput@gmail.com>
> ---
>  kernel/time/tick-sched.c |    2 +-
>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

applied to tip/timers/urgent, thanks Jaswinder!

	Ingo