public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Theodore Tso <tytso@mit.edu>
To: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@novell.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	ccache@lists.samba.org, Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [REGRESSION] Recent change to kernel spikes out ccache/distcc
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 08:40:47 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090115134047.GB30522@mit.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <496F0BC2.76E4.0078.0@novell.com>

On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 09:11:14AM +0000, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> 14.01.09 18:16 >>>
> >So what's the current status on this, could we get it reverted ASAP or
> >add that CONFIG_ switch (default N)?
> >
> >Leaving the build system broken for so long just isn't cool.
> 
> It is my understanding that Sam was looking at doing a partial revert first.
> If that doesn't work out, doing the CONFIG_* thing would be pretty trivial
> (I merged it into my local patch, and hence would simply have to extract it).

I just have a local branch, "emergency-fixes" which just reverts
commits ad7a953c and 9bb48247, which I pull in before doing full
builds.  

You can also work around the bug by disabling CONFIG_MODVERSIONS; one
of my build configurations has almost no modules at all but it still
had CONFIG_MODVERSIONS disabled, so for my sniff tests build of
mainline where I don't want to pull in the emergency-fixes branch,
I've also dealt with the situation by disabling CONFIG_MODVERSIONS.

These are both hacks, but they do work around the problem...

      	       	      	       	       - Ted

      reply	other threads:[~2009-01-15 13:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-01-06 15:15 [REGRESSION] Recent change to kernel spikes out ccache/distcc Theodore Ts'o
2009-01-06 15:29 ` Jan Beulich
2009-01-06 17:33   ` Theodore Tso
2009-01-06 17:48     ` Sam Ravnborg
2009-01-06 18:04       ` Theodore Tso
2009-01-07  8:50     ` Jan Beulich
2009-01-07 11:31       ` Sam Ravnborg
2009-01-07 12:35         ` Jan Beulich
2009-01-07 13:23           ` Sam Ravnborg
2009-01-07 13:48             ` Jan Beulich
2009-01-07 20:06               ` Sam Ravnborg
2009-01-08 19:16                 ` Kyle McMartin
2009-01-12 14:06                 ` Gilles Espinasse
2009-01-06 17:53   ` Sam Ravnborg
2009-01-06 16:26 ` David Miller
2009-01-06 18:12   ` Theodore Tso
2009-01-06 22:09 ` Sam Ravnborg
2009-01-07  4:33   ` Theodore Tso
2009-01-07  5:10 ` Al Viro
2009-01-07  8:49   ` Jan Beulich
2009-01-07 14:03     ` Al Viro
2009-01-07 14:28       ` Jan Beulich
2009-01-07 14:37         ` Al Viro
2009-01-07 14:40           ` Jan Beulich
2009-01-07 13:12 ` Theodore Tso
2009-01-07 13:39   ` Jan Beulich
2009-01-07 14:28     ` Theodore Tso
2009-01-07 14:39       ` Jan Beulich
2009-01-08 19:17   ` Dave Jones
2009-01-08 21:31     ` Theodore Tso
2009-01-11 21:48       ` Kyle McMartin
2009-01-11 22:11         ` Theodore Tso
2009-01-11 22:51         ` Theodore Tso
2009-01-11 22:55           ` Kyle McMartin
2009-01-14 17:16 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-01-15  9:11   ` Jan Beulich
2009-01-15 13:40     ` Theodore Tso [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090115134047.GB30522@mit.edu \
    --to=tytso@mit.edu \
    --cc=ccache@lists.samba.org \
    --cc=jbeulich@novell.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=sam@ravnborg.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox