Re: [patch 3/5] x86: headers cleanup - ptrace-abi.h

[Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>]

[H. Peter Anvin - Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 08:52:24AM -0800]
| Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
| > 
| > Hi Markus,
| > 
| > since it's supposed to be visible by userspace then we
| > should just remove this CONFIG_X86_PTRACE_BTS so if userspace
| > app has a reference to ptrace_bts_config but kernel in turn has
| > this feature turned off -- the uerspace app shouldn't fail
| > while being compiling.
| > 
| 
| Well, for userspace, the kernel configuration doesn't matter: the
| CONFIG_* macros *never* exist.

Let me explain more detailed what I've meant with my prev message.
Markus said that ptrace_bts_config is supposed to be visible in userspace,
right? So I've a program which is built under kernel with
CONFIG_X86_PTRACE_BTS turned on. Then I rebuild my kernel with
CONFIG_X86_PTRACE_BTS turned off. Then I decide to recompile
my program for some reason _and_ compilation shouldn't fail
because of lack of ptrace_bts_config struct. So for userspace
kernel configuration does matter if it touches data being referenced
from user-side. BUT all I said is valid (at least I hop so) if _only_
ptrace_bts_config is supposed to be visible to user-space programs.

| 
| This would be yet another good reason why having them be always defined
| and 0/1 instead would be such an improvement, but we're not there.
| 

oh, that reminds me autoconf horror :) I don't know if it possible
but we could have some common/base file with all CONFIG_ set to 0/1
which any header being exported to userspace should include, or
we could modify unifdef to process headers in fashion: scan the header,
insert CONFIG_'s refered in the header with value 0/1 at top of the
header. Not sure if it worth it (too many files are to be touched).

| 	-hpa
| 
| -- 
| H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
| I work for Intel.  I don't speak on their behalf.
| 

		- Cyrill -