public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
	Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org>,
	Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 3/3] pids: refactor vnr/nr_ns helpers to make them safe
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 06:55:20 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090116055520.GA28131@redhat.com> (raw)

Inho, the safety rules for vnr/nr_ns helpers are horrible and buggy.

task_pid_nr_ns(task) needs rcu/tasklist depending on task == current.

As for "special" pids, vnr/nr_ns helpers always need rcu. However,
if task != current, they are unsafe even under rcu lock, we can't
trust task->group_leader without the special checks.

And almost every helper has a callsite which needs a fix.

Also, it is a bit annoying that the implementations of, say,
task_pgrp_vnr() and task_pgrp_nr_ns() are not "symmetrical".

This patch introduces the new helper, __task_pid_nr_ns(), which is
always safe to use, and turns all other helpers into the trivial
wrappers.

If this patch is acceptable, I'll send another one which converts
task_tgid_xxx() as well, there are a bit special.

Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>

--- CUR/include/linux/sched.h~SP_3_NR	2009-01-16 02:13:50.000000000 +0100
+++ CUR/include/linux/sched.h	2009-01-16 04:16:12.000000000 +0100
@@ -1481,17 +1481,23 @@ struct pid_namespace;
  *
  * see also pid_nr() etc in include/linux/pid.h
  */
+pid_t __task_pid_nr_ns(struct task_struct *task, enum pid_type type,
+			struct pid_namespace *ns);
 
 static inline pid_t task_pid_nr(struct task_struct *tsk)
 {
 	return tsk->pid;
 }
 
-pid_t task_pid_nr_ns(struct task_struct *tsk, struct pid_namespace *ns);
+static inline pid_t task_pid_nr_ns(struct task_struct *tsk,
+					struct pid_namespace *ns)
+{
+	return __task_pid_nr_ns(tsk, PIDTYPE_PID, ns);
+}
 
 static inline pid_t task_pid_vnr(struct task_struct *tsk)
 {
-	return pid_vnr(task_pid(tsk));
+	return __task_pid_nr_ns(tsk, PIDTYPE_PID, NULL);
 }
 
 
@@ -1513,11 +1519,15 @@ static inline pid_t task_pgrp_nr(struct 
 	return tsk->signal->__pgrp;
 }
 
-pid_t task_pgrp_nr_ns(struct task_struct *tsk, struct pid_namespace *ns);
+static inline pid_t task_pgrp_nr_ns(struct task_struct *tsk,
+					struct pid_namespace *ns)
+{
+	return __task_pid_nr_ns(tsk, PIDTYPE_PGID, ns);
+}
 
 static inline pid_t task_pgrp_vnr(struct task_struct *tsk)
 {
-	return pid_vnr(task_pgrp(tsk));
+	return __task_pid_nr_ns(tsk, PIDTYPE_PGID, NULL);
 }
 
 
@@ -1526,14 +1536,17 @@ static inline pid_t task_session_nr(stru
 	return tsk->signal->__session;
 }
 
-pid_t task_session_nr_ns(struct task_struct *tsk, struct pid_namespace *ns);
+static inline pid_t task_session_nr_ns(struct task_struct *tsk,
+					struct pid_namespace *ns)
+{
+	return __task_pid_nr_ns(tsk, PIDTYPE_SID, ns);
+}
 
 static inline pid_t task_session_vnr(struct task_struct *tsk)
 {
-	return pid_vnr(task_session(tsk));
+	return __task_pid_nr_ns(tsk, PIDTYPE_SID, NULL);
 }
 
-
 /**
  * pid_alive - check that a task structure is not stale
  * @p: Task structure to be checked.
--- CUR/kernel/pid.c~SP_3_NR	2009-01-16 02:54:26.000000000 +0100
+++ CUR/kernel/pid.c	2009-01-16 05:40:43.000000000 +0100
@@ -452,11 +452,24 @@ pid_t pid_vnr(struct pid *pid)
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pid_vnr);
 
-pid_t task_pid_nr_ns(struct task_struct *tsk, struct pid_namespace *ns)
+pid_t __task_pid_nr_ns(struct task_struct *task, enum pid_type type,
+			struct pid_namespace *ns)
 {
-	return pid_nr_ns(task_pid(tsk), ns);
+	pid_t nr = 0;
+
+	rcu_read_lock();
+	if (!ns)
+		ns = current->nsproxy->pid_ns;
+	if (likely(pid_alive(task))) {
+		if (type != PIDTYPE_PID)
+			task = task->group_leader;
+		nr = pid_nr_ns(task->pids[type].pid, ns);
+	}
+	rcu_read_unlock();
+
+	return nr;
 }
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(task_pid_nr_ns);
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(__task_pid_nr_ns);
 
 pid_t task_tgid_nr_ns(struct task_struct *tsk, struct pid_namespace *ns)
 {
@@ -464,18 +477,6 @@ pid_t task_tgid_nr_ns(struct task_struct
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(task_tgid_nr_ns);
 
-pid_t task_pgrp_nr_ns(struct task_struct *tsk, struct pid_namespace *ns)
-{
-	return pid_nr_ns(task_pgrp(tsk), ns);
-}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(task_pgrp_nr_ns);
-
-pid_t task_session_nr_ns(struct task_struct *tsk, struct pid_namespace *ns)
-{
-	return pid_nr_ns(task_session(tsk), ns);
-}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(task_session_nr_ns);
-
 struct pid_namespace *task_active_pid_ns(struct task_struct *tsk)
 {
 	return ns_of_pid(task_pid(tsk));


             reply	other threads:[~2009-01-16  5:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-01-16  5:55 Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2009-01-16 10:35 ` [PATCH 3/3] pids: refactor vnr/nr_ns helpers to make them safe Louis Rilling
2009-01-16 20:45   ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-01-16 21:48     ` Louis Rilling
2009-01-16 22:21 ` Andrew Morton

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090116055520.GA28131@redhat.com \
    --to=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sukadev@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=xemul@openvz.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox