From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org>,
Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 3/3] pids: refactor vnr/nr_ns helpers to make them safe
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 06:55:20 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090116055520.GA28131@redhat.com> (raw)
Inho, the safety rules for vnr/nr_ns helpers are horrible and buggy.
task_pid_nr_ns(task) needs rcu/tasklist depending on task == current.
As for "special" pids, vnr/nr_ns helpers always need rcu. However,
if task != current, they are unsafe even under rcu lock, we can't
trust task->group_leader without the special checks.
And almost every helper has a callsite which needs a fix.
Also, it is a bit annoying that the implementations of, say,
task_pgrp_vnr() and task_pgrp_nr_ns() are not "symmetrical".
This patch introduces the new helper, __task_pid_nr_ns(), which is
always safe to use, and turns all other helpers into the trivial
wrappers.
If this patch is acceptable, I'll send another one which converts
task_tgid_xxx() as well, there are a bit special.
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
--- CUR/include/linux/sched.h~SP_3_NR 2009-01-16 02:13:50.000000000 +0100
+++ CUR/include/linux/sched.h 2009-01-16 04:16:12.000000000 +0100
@@ -1481,17 +1481,23 @@ struct pid_namespace;
*
* see also pid_nr() etc in include/linux/pid.h
*/
+pid_t __task_pid_nr_ns(struct task_struct *task, enum pid_type type,
+ struct pid_namespace *ns);
static inline pid_t task_pid_nr(struct task_struct *tsk)
{
return tsk->pid;
}
-pid_t task_pid_nr_ns(struct task_struct *tsk, struct pid_namespace *ns);
+static inline pid_t task_pid_nr_ns(struct task_struct *tsk,
+ struct pid_namespace *ns)
+{
+ return __task_pid_nr_ns(tsk, PIDTYPE_PID, ns);
+}
static inline pid_t task_pid_vnr(struct task_struct *tsk)
{
- return pid_vnr(task_pid(tsk));
+ return __task_pid_nr_ns(tsk, PIDTYPE_PID, NULL);
}
@@ -1513,11 +1519,15 @@ static inline pid_t task_pgrp_nr(struct
return tsk->signal->__pgrp;
}
-pid_t task_pgrp_nr_ns(struct task_struct *tsk, struct pid_namespace *ns);
+static inline pid_t task_pgrp_nr_ns(struct task_struct *tsk,
+ struct pid_namespace *ns)
+{
+ return __task_pid_nr_ns(tsk, PIDTYPE_PGID, ns);
+}
static inline pid_t task_pgrp_vnr(struct task_struct *tsk)
{
- return pid_vnr(task_pgrp(tsk));
+ return __task_pid_nr_ns(tsk, PIDTYPE_PGID, NULL);
}
@@ -1526,14 +1536,17 @@ static inline pid_t task_session_nr(stru
return tsk->signal->__session;
}
-pid_t task_session_nr_ns(struct task_struct *tsk, struct pid_namespace *ns);
+static inline pid_t task_session_nr_ns(struct task_struct *tsk,
+ struct pid_namespace *ns)
+{
+ return __task_pid_nr_ns(tsk, PIDTYPE_SID, ns);
+}
static inline pid_t task_session_vnr(struct task_struct *tsk)
{
- return pid_vnr(task_session(tsk));
+ return __task_pid_nr_ns(tsk, PIDTYPE_SID, NULL);
}
-
/**
* pid_alive - check that a task structure is not stale
* @p: Task structure to be checked.
--- CUR/kernel/pid.c~SP_3_NR 2009-01-16 02:54:26.000000000 +0100
+++ CUR/kernel/pid.c 2009-01-16 05:40:43.000000000 +0100
@@ -452,11 +452,24 @@ pid_t pid_vnr(struct pid *pid)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pid_vnr);
-pid_t task_pid_nr_ns(struct task_struct *tsk, struct pid_namespace *ns)
+pid_t __task_pid_nr_ns(struct task_struct *task, enum pid_type type,
+ struct pid_namespace *ns)
{
- return pid_nr_ns(task_pid(tsk), ns);
+ pid_t nr = 0;
+
+ rcu_read_lock();
+ if (!ns)
+ ns = current->nsproxy->pid_ns;
+ if (likely(pid_alive(task))) {
+ if (type != PIDTYPE_PID)
+ task = task->group_leader;
+ nr = pid_nr_ns(task->pids[type].pid, ns);
+ }
+ rcu_read_unlock();
+
+ return nr;
}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(task_pid_nr_ns);
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(__task_pid_nr_ns);
pid_t task_tgid_nr_ns(struct task_struct *tsk, struct pid_namespace *ns)
{
@@ -464,18 +477,6 @@ pid_t task_tgid_nr_ns(struct task_struct
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(task_tgid_nr_ns);
-pid_t task_pgrp_nr_ns(struct task_struct *tsk, struct pid_namespace *ns)
-{
- return pid_nr_ns(task_pgrp(tsk), ns);
-}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(task_pgrp_nr_ns);
-
-pid_t task_session_nr_ns(struct task_struct *tsk, struct pid_namespace *ns)
-{
- return pid_nr_ns(task_session(tsk), ns);
-}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(task_session_nr_ns);
-
struct pid_namespace *task_active_pid_ns(struct task_struct *tsk)
{
return ns_of_pid(task_pid(tsk));
next reply other threads:[~2009-01-16 5:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-01-16 5:55 Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2009-01-16 10:35 ` [PATCH 3/3] pids: refactor vnr/nr_ns helpers to make them safe Louis Rilling
2009-01-16 20:45 ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-01-16 21:48 ` Louis Rilling
2009-01-16 22:21 ` Andrew Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090116055520.GA28131@redhat.com \
--to=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sukadev@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=xemul@openvz.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox