From: Jesse Barnes <jesse.barnes@intel.com>
To: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
Cc: Kenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com>,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com>,
linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
"linux-kernel" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, shaohua.li@intel.com
Subject: Re: ACPI hotplug panic with current git head
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 12:22:55 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200901161222.56272.jesse.barnes@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.2.00.0901161504140.5705@localhost.localdomain>
On Friday, January 16, 2009 12:08 pm Len Brown wrote:
> > > It looks like acpi_pci_get_bridge_handle() is returning NULL, so this
> > > is the fix that works for me.
> >
> > I'm sorry for troubling you, and thank you for your patience.
> >
> > The patch seems to avoid the kernel panic, but I still don't know
> > why acpi_pci_get_bridge_handle() returns NULL here. I assumed
> > it should return non-NULL value here. So I'd like to investigate
> > it more.
>
> Kenji,
> I'd like to push jejb's 1-liner upstream now.
> It make sense, and it prevents a boot panic regression
> that I'd rather not have others experience in rc2.
>
> I agree that it is important to hotplug for you to figure out
> why this machine runs down that path in the first place,
> and I'm sure that James will continue to work with you
> on that after the 1-liner is in.
>
> thanks
> Len Brown, Intel Open Source Technology Center
>
> > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/hotplug/acpiphp_glue.c
> > > b/drivers/pci/hotplug/acpiphp_glue.c index f09b101..803d9dd 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/pci/hotplug/acpiphp_glue.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/pci/hotplug/acpiphp_glue.c
> > > @@ -266,6 +266,8 @@ static int detect_ejectable_slots(struct pci_bus
> > > *pbus) int found = acpi_pci_detect_ejectable(pbus);
> > > if (!found) {
> > > acpi_handle bridge_handle = acpi_pci_get_bridge_handle(pbus);
> > > + if (!bridge_handle)
> > > + return 0;
> > > acpi_walk_namespace(ACPI_TYPE_DEVICE, bridge_handle, (u32)1,
> > > is_pci_dock_device, (void *)&found, NULL);
> > > }
Agreed. It's funky that we're getting back a NULL here, but we definitely
don't want people's machines to crash while we figure out what's going
wrong...
--
Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technology Center
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-01-16 20:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-01-10 16:17 ACPI hotplug panic with current git head James Bottomley
2009-01-12 21:16 ` Len Brown
2009-01-13 0:48 ` James Bottomley
2009-01-13 3:40 ` Len Brown
2009-01-15 19:01 ` James Bottomley
2009-01-15 19:22 ` Len Brown
2009-01-15 19:54 ` James Bottomley
2009-01-15 20:12 ` James Bottomley
2009-01-16 6:07 ` Kenji Kaneshige
2009-01-16 14:19 ` James Bottomley
2009-01-19 1:10 ` Kenji Kaneshige
2009-01-19 1:23 ` James Bottomley
2009-01-19 3:11 ` Kenji Kaneshige
2009-01-21 17:26 ` James Bottomley
2009-01-26 2:11 ` Kenji Kaneshige
2009-01-26 6:21 ` Grant Grundler
2009-01-26 12:27 ` Kenji Kaneshige
2009-01-28 11:47 ` Kenji Kaneshige
2009-01-28 11:48 ` [PATCH 1/8] PCI/ACPI: fix wrong assumption in acpi_pci_get_bridge_handle Kenji Kaneshige
2009-01-28 11:50 ` [PATCH 2/8] PCI/ACPI: fix wrong assumption in acpi_find_root_bridge_handle Kenji Kaneshige
2009-01-28 11:51 ` [PATCH 3/8] PCI hotplug: fix wrong assumption in acpi_get_hp_params_from_firmware Kenji Kaneshige
2009-01-28 11:55 ` [PATCH 4/8] PCI hotplug: fix wrong assumption in acpi_get_hp_hw_control_from_firmware Kenji Kaneshige
2009-01-28 11:56 ` [PATCH 5/8] PCI: fix wrong assumption in pci_find_upstream_pcie_bridge Kenji Kaneshige
2009-01-28 11:57 ` [PATCH 6/8] PCI: fix wrong assumption in pci_read_bridge_bases Kenji Kaneshige
2009-01-28 11:58 ` [PATCH 7/8] PCI: fix wrong assumption in pci_get_interrupt_pin Kenji Kaneshige
2009-01-28 11:59 ` [PATCH 8/8] PCI: fix wrong assumption in pci_common_swizzle Kenji Kaneshige
2009-01-28 12:05 ` ACPI hotplug panic with current git head Kenji Kaneshige
2009-02-14 0:30 ` Jesse Barnes
[not found] ` <499A46CC.1020102@jp.fujitsu.com>
2009-02-18 18:59 ` Jesse Barnes
2009-02-18 19:08 ` James Bottomley
2009-02-18 19:41 ` Jesse Barnes
2009-03-02 17:07 ` James Bottomley
2009-01-16 20:08 ` Len Brown
2009-01-16 20:22 ` Jesse Barnes [this message]
2009-01-19 1:15 ` Kenji Kaneshige
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200901161222.56272.jesse.barnes@intel.com \
--to=jesse.barnes@intel.com \
--cc=James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
--cc=kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shaohua.li@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox