From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: ebiederm@xmission.com, roland@redhat.com, bastian@waldi.eu.org,
daniel@hozac.com, xemul@openvz.org, containers@lists.osdl.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/7][v7] Protect cinit from unblocked SIG_DFL signals
Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 23:12:42 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090117221242.GA3962@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090117203621.GE11825@us.ibm.com>
On 01/17, Sukadev Bhattiprolu wrote:
>
> @@ -1331,7 +1341,7 @@ int send_sigqueue(struct sigqueue *q, struct task_struct *t, int group)
> goto ret;
>
> ret = 1; /* the signal is ignored */
> - if (!prepare_signal(sig, t))
> + if (!prepare_signal(sig, t, 1))
Hmm, just noticed. This looks wrong, it should be prepare_signal(sig, t, 0),
no?
For example, /sbin/init can create the posix timer with sigev_signo = SIGKILL
and it won't be killed before this patch.
This also looks wrong from the masquerading pov.
Otherwise, the patches 1-6 are imho fine.
Oleg.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-01-17 22:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-01-17 20:26 [PATCH 0/7][v7] Container-init signal semantics Sukadev Bhattiprolu
2009-01-17 20:35 ` [PATCH 1/7][v7] Remove 'handler' parameter to tracehook functions Sukadev Bhattiprolu
2009-01-17 20:35 ` [PATCH 2/7][v7] Protect init from unwanted signals more Sukadev Bhattiprolu
2009-01-17 20:35 ` [PATCH 3/7][v7] Add from_ancestor_ns parameter to send_signal() Sukadev Bhattiprolu
2009-01-17 20:36 ` [PATCH 4/7][v7] Protect cinit from unblocked SIG_DFL signals Sukadev Bhattiprolu
2009-01-17 22:12 ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2009-01-20 1:07 ` Sukadev Bhattiprolu
2009-01-20 1:09 ` Sukadev Bhattiprolu
2009-01-17 20:36 ` [PATCH 5/7][v7] Protect cinit from blocked fatal signals Sukadev Bhattiprolu
2009-01-17 20:37 ` [PATCH 6/7][v7] SI_USER: Masquerade si_pid when crossing pid ns boundary Sukadev Bhattiprolu
2009-01-17 20:37 ` [PATCH 7/7][v7] proc: Show SIG_DFL signals to init as "ignored" signals Sukadev Bhattiprolu
2009-01-17 22:19 ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-01-20 1:04 ` Sukadev Bhattiprolu
2009-01-20 7:33 ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-01-20 16:09 ` Sukadev Bhattiprolu
2009-01-19 2:09 ` [PATCH 0/7][v7] Container-init signal semantics KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-01-21 3:05 ` Sukadev Bhattiprolu
2009-01-21 3:53 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-01-21 4:16 ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-01-21 4:23 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-01-21 4:05 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2009-01-22 5:48 ` Matt Helsley
2009-01-21 4:39 ` Bryan Donlan
2009-01-21 8:31 ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-02-07 21:20 ` Sukadev Bhattiprolu
2009-02-09 4:04 ` Roland McGrath
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090117221242.GA3962@redhat.com \
--to=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=bastian@waldi.eu.org \
--cc=containers@lists.osdl.org \
--cc=daniel@hozac.com \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=roland@redhat.com \
--cc=sukadev@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=xemul@openvz.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).