From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755569AbZASOQo (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Jan 2009 09:16:44 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753911AbZASOOQ (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Jan 2009 09:14:16 -0500 Received: from mail-gx0-f25.google.com ([209.85.217.25]:49984 "EHLO mail-gx0-f25.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753598AbZASOON (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Jan 2009 09:14:13 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=IE8fvwCTUqS/dql6buDa6NH72witAtB1uXxAL3sMrV/Se947RLGAczZpiRSymjEIsR PBCH+EQWwRI3+12lsdH/Cy5CzCGcarTjQ+hPBCRDC2NHLbEDysFl+T7Kg093ZsixA5nl BSDPjHANF7gPtLE9IXZPlXoBxDk1s8ju/wTJc= Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 22:13:46 +0800 From: =?utf-8?Q?Am=C3=A9rico?= Wang To: xming Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: wrong sym link with out-of-tree build with 2.6.28 Message-ID: <20090119141346.GA8258@hack.private> References: <519a8b110901190604l4c248ea2n88a117a064c35fac@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <519a8b110901190604l4c248ea2n88a117a064c35fac@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 03:04:54PM +0100, xming wrote: >Hi, > >I am building kernels on x86 and there is a problems with include2/asm >symbolic link >when building the with 'make O=./HOST". > >- with 2.6.28.x the include/asm-x86 is moved to arch/x86/include/asm > so this code is no more valid: > ln -fsn $(srctree)/include/asm-$(SRCARCH) include2/asm; > >That line of code should be made ARCH aware? I don't know how to do that, I can >only change that for x86 only. > >BTW: I am not subscribed to lkml, please CC when replying, thanks Please have a look at this thread: http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/8/15/166 I think Sam explained there. Thanks. -- "Against stupidity, the gods themselves, contend in vain."