public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	xfs@oss.sgi.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: spurious -ENOSPC on XFS
Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 10:24:22 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090120232422.GF10158@disturbed> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0901201430250.4603@hs20-bc2-1.build.redhat.com>

On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 02:38:27PM -0500, Mikulas Patocka wrote:
> 
> 
> On Sun, 18 Jan 2009, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> 
> > On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 11:28:58PM -0500, Mikulas Patocka wrote:
> > > The result must not depend on magic timer values. If it does, you end up 
> > > with undebbugable nondeterministic failures.
> > > 
> > > Why don't you change that 500ms wait to "wait until the flush finishes"? 
> > > That would be correct.
> > 
> > Yes, this probably would better.  Could I motivate you to come up with
> > a patch for that?
> > 
> 
> Hi
> 
> I looked at the source and found out that it uses sync_blockdev for 
> syncing --- but sync_blockdev writes only metadata buffers, it doesn't 
> touch inodes and pages and doesn't resolve delayed allocations. So it 
> really doesn't sync anything.

Ah, bugger. Thanks for finding this.

> I replaced it with correct syncing of all inodes. With this patch it 
> passes my testcase (no more spurious -ENOSPCs), but it still isn't 
> correct, there is that 500ms delay --- if the machine was so overloaded 
> that it couldn't sync withing 500ms, you still get spurious -ENOSPC.

That's VFS level data syncing - there may be other XFS level stuff
that can be dones as well (e.g. cleanup/truncate of unlinked inodes)
that will release space.

> There are notions about possible deadlocks (the syncer may lock against 
> the process that is waiting for the sync to finish), that's why removing 
> that 500ms delay isn't that easy as it seems. I don't have XFS knowledge 
> to check for the deadlocks, it should be done by XFS developers. Also, 
> when you resolve the deadlocks and drop the timeout, replace WB_SYNC_NONE 
> with WB_SYNC_ALL in this patch.

Right, so you need to use internal xfs sync functions that don't
have these problems. That is:

	error = xfs_sync_inodes(ip->i_mount, SYNC_DELWRI|SYNC_WAIT);

will do a blocking flush of all the inodes without deadlocks occurring.
Then you can remove the 500ms wait.

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com

  reply	other threads:[~2009-01-20 23:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-01-12 11:14 spurious -ENOSPC on XFS Mikulas Patocka
2009-01-12 15:11 ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-01-13  5:58   ` Lachlan McIlroy
2009-01-14 22:16     ` Dave Chinner
2009-01-15  0:57       ` Lachlan McIlroy
2009-01-15  8:47         ` Dave Chinner
2009-01-13 21:49 ` Dave Chinner
2009-01-14  4:28   ` Mikulas Patocka
2009-01-18 17:31     ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-01-20 19:38       ` Mikulas Patocka
2009-01-20 23:24         ` Dave Chinner [this message]
2009-01-22 20:59           ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-01-22 22:43             ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-01-23 20:14               ` Mikulas Patocka
2009-01-24  7:12                 ` Dave Chinner
2009-01-29 16:39                   ` Mikulas Patocka
2009-01-29 16:45                     ` Mikulas Patocka
2009-01-31 23:57                     ` Dave Chinner
2009-02-02 17:36                       ` Mikulas Patocka
2009-02-03  3:27                         ` Dave Chinner
2009-02-03 20:05                           ` Mikulas Patocka
2009-02-04 12:08                             ` Dave Chinner
2009-02-05  4:31                               ` Mikulas Patocka
2009-02-05  7:43                                 ` Dave Chinner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090120232422.GF10158@disturbed \
    --to=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mpatocka@redhat.com \
    --cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox