From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
xfs@oss.sgi.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: spurious -ENOSPC on XFS
Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 10:24:22 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090120232422.GF10158@disturbed> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0901201430250.4603@hs20-bc2-1.build.redhat.com>
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 02:38:27PM -0500, Mikulas Patocka wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, 18 Jan 2009, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 11:28:58PM -0500, Mikulas Patocka wrote:
> > > The result must not depend on magic timer values. If it does, you end up
> > > with undebbugable nondeterministic failures.
> > >
> > > Why don't you change that 500ms wait to "wait until the flush finishes"?
> > > That would be correct.
> >
> > Yes, this probably would better. Could I motivate you to come up with
> > a patch for that?
> >
>
> Hi
>
> I looked at the source and found out that it uses sync_blockdev for
> syncing --- but sync_blockdev writes only metadata buffers, it doesn't
> touch inodes and pages and doesn't resolve delayed allocations. So it
> really doesn't sync anything.
Ah, bugger. Thanks for finding this.
> I replaced it with correct syncing of all inodes. With this patch it
> passes my testcase (no more spurious -ENOSPCs), but it still isn't
> correct, there is that 500ms delay --- if the machine was so overloaded
> that it couldn't sync withing 500ms, you still get spurious -ENOSPC.
That's VFS level data syncing - there may be other XFS level stuff
that can be dones as well (e.g. cleanup/truncate of unlinked inodes)
that will release space.
> There are notions about possible deadlocks (the syncer may lock against
> the process that is waiting for the sync to finish), that's why removing
> that 500ms delay isn't that easy as it seems. I don't have XFS knowledge
> to check for the deadlocks, it should be done by XFS developers. Also,
> when you resolve the deadlocks and drop the timeout, replace WB_SYNC_NONE
> with WB_SYNC_ALL in this patch.
Right, so you need to use internal xfs sync functions that don't
have these problems. That is:
error = xfs_sync_inodes(ip->i_mount, SYNC_DELWRI|SYNC_WAIT);
will do a blocking flush of all the inodes without deadlocks occurring.
Then you can remove the 500ms wait.
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-01-20 23:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-01-12 11:14 spurious -ENOSPC on XFS Mikulas Patocka
2009-01-12 15:11 ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-01-13 5:58 ` Lachlan McIlroy
2009-01-14 22:16 ` Dave Chinner
2009-01-15 0:57 ` Lachlan McIlroy
2009-01-15 8:47 ` Dave Chinner
2009-01-13 21:49 ` Dave Chinner
2009-01-14 4:28 ` Mikulas Patocka
2009-01-18 17:31 ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-01-20 19:38 ` Mikulas Patocka
2009-01-20 23:24 ` Dave Chinner [this message]
2009-01-22 20:59 ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-01-22 22:43 ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-01-23 20:14 ` Mikulas Patocka
2009-01-24 7:12 ` Dave Chinner
2009-01-29 16:39 ` Mikulas Patocka
2009-01-29 16:45 ` Mikulas Patocka
2009-01-31 23:57 ` Dave Chinner
2009-02-02 17:36 ` Mikulas Patocka
2009-02-03 3:27 ` Dave Chinner
2009-02-03 20:05 ` Mikulas Patocka
2009-02-04 12:08 ` Dave Chinner
2009-02-05 4:31 ` Mikulas Patocka
2009-02-05 7:43 ` Dave Chinner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090120232422.GF10158@disturbed \
--to=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mpatocka@redhat.com \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox