public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mandeep Singh Baines <msb@google.com>
To: fweisbec@gmail.com, mingo@elte.hu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: rientjes@google.com, mbligh@google.com, thockin@google.com
Subject: [PATCH] softlockup: remove hung_task_check_count
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 17:46:15 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090121014615.GA21018@google.com> (raw)

As suggested by Frederic Weisbecker.

Patch against tip/core/softlockup.

---
To avoid holding the tasklist lock too long, hung_task_check_count was used
as an upper bound on the number of tasks that are checked by hung_task.
This can be problematic if hung_task_check_count is set much lower than
the number of tasks in the system. A large number of tasks will not get
checked. This patch removes the hung_task_check_count sysctl.

Instead of checking a limited number of tasks, all tasks are checked. To
avoid holding the tasklist lock too long, the lock is released and the
processor rescheduled (if necessary) every n tasks (currently 1024).

The design was proposed by Frédéric Weisbecker.

Frédéric Weisbecker (fweisbec@gmail.com) wrote:
>
> Instead of having this arbitrary limit of tasks, why not just
> lurk the need_resched() and then schedule if it needs too.
>
> I know that sounds a bit racy, because you will have to release the
> tasklist_lock and
> a lot of things can happen in the task list until you become resched.
> But you can do a get_task_struct() on g and t before your thread is
> going to sleep and then put them
> when it is awaken.
> Perhaps some tasks will disappear or be appended in the list before g
> and t, but that doesn't really matter:
> if they disappear, they didn't lockup, and if they were appended, they
> are not enough cold to be analyzed :-)
>
> This way you can drop the arbitrary limit of task number given by the user....
>
> Frederic.
>

Signed-off-by: Mandeep Singh Baines <msb@google.com>
---
 include/linux/sched.h |    1 -
 kernel/hung_task.c    |   25 +++++++++++++++++++++----
 kernel/sysctl.c       |    9 ---------
 3 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
index f2f94d5..278121c 100644
--- a/include/linux/sched.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched.h
@@ -315,7 +315,6 @@ static inline void touch_all_softlockup_watchdogs(void)
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_DETECT_HUNG_TASK
 extern unsigned int  sysctl_hung_task_panic;
-extern unsigned long sysctl_hung_task_check_count;
 extern unsigned long sysctl_hung_task_timeout_secs;
 extern unsigned long sysctl_hung_task_warnings;
 extern int proc_dohung_task_timeout_secs(struct ctl_table *table, int write,
diff --git a/kernel/hung_task.c b/kernel/hung_task.c
index ba8ccd4..f9b18e2 100644
--- a/kernel/hung_task.c
+++ b/kernel/hung_task.c
@@ -19,7 +19,7 @@
 /*
  * Have a reasonable limit on the number of tasks checked:
  */
-unsigned long __read_mostly sysctl_hung_task_check_count = 1024;
+#define HUNG_TASK_CHECK_COUNT 1024
 
 /*
  * Zero means infinite timeout - no checking done:
@@ -116,7 +116,7 @@ static void check_hung_task(struct task_struct *t, unsigned long now,
  */
 static void check_hung_uninterruptible_tasks(unsigned long timeout)
 {
-	int max_count = sysctl_hung_task_check_count;
+	int max_count = HUNG_TASK_CHECK_COUNT;
 	unsigned long now = get_timestamp();
 	struct task_struct *g, *t;
 
@@ -129,8 +129,25 @@ static void check_hung_uninterruptible_tasks(unsigned long timeout)
 
 	read_lock(&tasklist_lock);
 	do_each_thread(g, t) {
-		if (!--max_count)
-			goto unlock;
+		if (!--max_count) {
+			/*
+			 * Drop the lock every once in a while and resched if
+			 * necessary. Don't want to hold the lock too long.
+			 */
+			get_task_struct(t);
+			read_unlock(&tasklist_lock);
+			max_count = HUNG_TASK_CHECK_COUNT;
+			if (need_resched())
+				schedule();
+			read_lock(&tasklist_lock);
+			put_task_struct(t);
+			/*
+			 * t was unlinked from tasklist. Can't continue in this
+			 * case. Exit and try again next time.
+			 */
+			if (t->state == TASK_DEAD)
+				goto unlock;
+		}
 		/* use "==" to skip the TASK_KILLABLE tasks waiting on NFS */
 		if (t->state == TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE)
 			check_hung_task(t, now, timeout);
diff --git a/kernel/sysctl.c b/kernel/sysctl.c
index 2481ed3..16526a2 100644
--- a/kernel/sysctl.c
+++ b/kernel/sysctl.c
@@ -820,15 +820,6 @@ static struct ctl_table kern_table[] = {
 	},
 	{
 		.ctl_name	= CTL_UNNUMBERED,
-		.procname	= "hung_task_check_count",
-		.data		= &sysctl_hung_task_check_count,
-		.maxlen		= sizeof(unsigned long),
-		.mode		= 0644,
-		.proc_handler	= &proc_doulongvec_minmax,
-		.strategy	= &sysctl_intvec,
-	},
-	{
-		.ctl_name	= CTL_UNNUMBERED,
 		.procname	= "hung_task_timeout_secs",
 		.data		= &sysctl_hung_task_timeout_secs,
 		.maxlen		= sizeof(unsigned long),
-- 
1.5.4.5


             reply	other threads:[~2009-01-21  1:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-01-21  1:46 Mandeep Singh Baines [this message]
2009-01-21 11:13 ` [PATCH] softlockup: remove hung_task_check_count Ingo Molnar
2009-01-21 13:14   ` Frédéric Weisbecker
2009-01-22  0:54   ` [PATCH v2] " Mandeep Singh Baines
2009-01-22  8:34     ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-22 19:55       ` [PATCH v3] " Mandeep Singh Baines
2009-01-23  3:21         ` Mandeep Baines
2009-01-23  9:23           ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-23 10:04             ` Frédéric Weisbecker
2009-01-24  1:55               ` Mandeep Singh Baines
2009-01-24 15:52                 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-01-26  2:25                   ` Mandeep Baines
2009-01-24  2:56             ` Mandeep Singh Baines

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090121014615.GA21018@google.com \
    --to=msb@google.com \
    --cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mbligh@google.com \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=thockin@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox