From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+w=401wt.eu-S1763622AbZAUIjH@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1763622AbZAUIjH (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Wed, 21 Jan 2009 03:39:07 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1756151AbZAUIiv
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Wed, 21 Jan 2009 03:38:51 -0500
Received: from one.firstfloor.org ([213.235.205.2]:35199 "EHLO
	one.firstfloor.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1755997AbZAUIiu (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 21 Jan 2009 03:38:50 -0500
Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 09:54:02 +0100
From: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
       David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>, Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>,
       Bernd Schmidt <bernds_cb1@t-online.de>,
       Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
       Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
       Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@gmail.com>,
       "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>,
       Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
       Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>, paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
       Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@novell.com>, Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx>,
       Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
       linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
       linux-btrfs <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>,
       Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
       Peter Morreale <pmorreale@novell.com>,
       Sven Dietrich <SDietrich@novell.com>, jh@suse.cz
Subject: Re: gcc inlining heuristics was Re: [PATCH -v7][RFC]: mutex: implement adaptive spinning
Message-ID: <20090121085402.GD15750@one.firstfloor.org>
References: <496BBE27.2020206@t-online.de> <20090119001345.GA9880@elte.hu> <20090119062212.GC22584@wotan.suse.de> <alpine.LFD.2.00.0901200754100.2974@localhost.localdomain> <20090120005124.GD16304@wotan.suse.de> <20090120123824.GD7790@elte.hu> <1232480940.22233.1435.camel@macbook.infradead.org> <20090120210515.GC19710@elte.hu> <alpine.LFD.2.00.0901210814130.2892@localhost.localdomain> <20090120220516.GA10483@elte.hu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20090120220516.GA10483@elte.hu>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

> GCC 4.3.2. Maybe i missed something obvious?

The typical use case of restrict is to tell it that multiple given
arrays are independent and then give the loop optimizer 
more freedom to handle expressions in the loop that
accesses these arrays.

Since there are no loops in the list functions nothing changed.

Ok presumably there are some other optimizations which 
rely on that alias information too, but again the list_*
stuff is probably too simple to trigger any of them.

-Andi