From: "Américo Wang" <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>
To: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
Cc: Josef Bacik <jbacik@redhat.com>,
linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Subject: Re: [Patch] Btrfs: use BTRFS_VOL_NAME_MAX for struct btrfs_ioctl_vol_args
Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 00:11:04 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090122161104.GF9732@hack.private> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1232550248.17244.7.camel@think.oraclecorp.com>
On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 10:04:08AM -0500, Chris Mason wrote:
>On Mon, 2009-01-19 at 21:12 +0800, Américo Wang wrote:
>> On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 08:03:37AM -0500, Josef Bacik wrote:
>> >On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 08:57:32PM +0800, Américo Wang wrote:
>> >>
>> >> I found userspace tool, btrfsctl, uses BTRFS_VOL_NAME_MAX, and
>> >> it also looks that this one is more proper.
>> >>
>> >> Kill BTRFS_PATH_NAME_MAX since no one will use it.
>> >>
>> >
>> >Nope, BTRFS_PATH_NAME_MAX is specifically used for the ioctl stuff, makes the
>> >arguments 4k aligned, this patch is incorrect. Thanks,
>>
>> Ok, then what is BTRFS_VOL_NAME_MAX? :)
>
>Right now it is only used in the progs. The disk format doesn't really
>have a max there, it is just to keep names usable. But, we should add a
>check in the kernel ioctl side, are you interested in sending a patch
>for it?
>
Yup, I will do.
Thanks.
--
"Against stupidity, the gods themselves, contend in vain."
prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-01-22 16:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-01-19 12:57 [Patch] Btrfs: use BTRFS_VOL_NAME_MAX for struct btrfs_ioctl_vol_args Américo Wang
2009-01-19 13:03 ` Josef Bacik
2009-01-19 13:12 ` Américo Wang
2009-01-21 15:04 ` Chris Mason
2009-01-22 16:11 ` Américo Wang [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090122161104.GF9732@hack.private \
--to=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=chris.mason@oracle.com \
--cc=jbacik@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox