public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Subject: [RFC PATCH 15/19] lockdep: merge the !_READ mark_lock_irq() helpers
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 18:37:16 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090122174053.556474458@chello.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20090122173701.674448070@chello.nl

[-- Attachment #1: lockdep-mark_irq5.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 3562 bytes --]

These two are also remakably similar

Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
---
 kernel/lockdep.c |   58 ++++++++++++++-----------------------------------------
 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-)

Index: linux-2.6/kernel/lockdep.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/lockdep.c
+++ linux-2.6/kernel/lockdep.c
@@ -2056,31 +2056,39 @@ static int exclusive_bit(int new_bit)
 	return state | (dir ^ 2);
 }
 
+typedef int (*check_usage_f)(struct task_struct *, struct held_lock *,
+			     enum lock_usage_bit bit, const char *name);
+
 static int
-mark_lock_irq_used_in(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *this,
+mark_lock_irq_write(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *this,
 		      int new_bit)
 {
 	const char *name = state_name(new_bit);
 	const char *rname = state_rname(new_bit);
 
 	int excl_bit = exclusive_bit(new_bit);
+	int dir = new_bit & 2;
+
+	check_usage_f usage = dir ?
+		check_usage_backwards : check_usage_forwards;
 
 	if (!valid_state(curr, this, new_bit, excl_bit))
 		return 0;
 	if (!valid_state(curr, this, new_bit, excl_bit + 1))
 		return 0;
+
 	/*
 	 * just marked it hardirq-safe, check that this lock
 	 * took no hardirq-unsafe lock in the past:
 	 */
-	if (!check_usage_forwards(curr, this, excl_bit, name))
+	if (!usage(curr, this, excl_bit, name))
 		return 0;
 #if STRICT_READ_CHECKS
 	/*
 	 * just marked it hardirq-safe, check that this lock
 	 * took no hardirq-unsafe-read lock in the past:
 	 */
-	if (!check_usage_forwards(curr, this, excl_bit + 1, rname))
+	if (!usage(curr, this, excl_bit + 1, rname))
 		return 0;
 #endif
 	if (state_verbose(new_bit, hlock_class(this)))
@@ -2124,40 +2132,6 @@ mark_lock_irq_read(struct task_struct *c
 	return 1;
 }
 
-static int
-mark_lock_irq_enabled(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *this,
-		      int new_bit)
-{
-	const char *name = state_name(new_bit);
-	const char *rname = state_rname(new_bit);
-
-	int excl_bit = exclusive_bit(new_bit);
-
-	if (!valid_state(curr, this, new_bit, excl_bit))
-		return 0;
-	if (!valid_state(curr, this, new_bit, excl_bit + 1))
-		return 0;
-	/*
-	 * just marked it hardirq-unsafe, check that no hardirq-safe
-	 * lock in the system ever took it in the past:
-	 */
-	if (!check_usage_backwards(curr, this, excl_bit, name))
-		return 0;
-#if STRICT_READ_CHECKS
-	/*
-	 * just marked it hardirq-unsafe, check that no
-	 * hardirq-safe-read lock in the system ever took
-	 * it in the past:
-	 */
-	if (!check_usage_backwards(curr, this, excl_bit + 1, rname))
-		return 0;
-#endif
-	if (state_verbose(new_bit, hlock_class(this)))
-		return 2;
-
-	return 1;
-}
-
 static int mark_lock_irq(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *this,
 		enum lock_usage_bit new_bit)
 {
@@ -2167,7 +2141,10 @@ static int mark_lock_irq(struct task_str
 	case LOCK_USED_IN_HARDIRQ:
 	case LOCK_USED_IN_SOFTIRQ:
 	case LOCK_USED_IN_RECLAIM_FS:
-		return mark_lock_irq_used_in(curr, this, new_bit);
+	case LOCK_ENABLED_HARDIRQ:
+	case LOCK_ENABLED_SOFTIRQ:
+	case LOCK_ENABLED_RECLAIM_FS:
+		return mark_lock_irq_write(curr, this, new_bit);
 
 	case LOCK_USED_IN_HARDIRQ_READ:
 	case LOCK_USED_IN_SOFTIRQ_READ:
@@ -2177,11 +2154,6 @@ static int mark_lock_irq(struct task_str
 	case LOCK_ENABLED_RECLAIM_FS_READ:
 		return mark_lock_irq_read(curr, this, new_bit);
 
-	case LOCK_ENABLED_HARDIRQ:
-	case LOCK_ENABLED_SOFTIRQ:
-	case LOCK_ENABLED_RECLAIM_FS:
-		return mark_lock_irq_enabled(curr, this, new_bit);
-
 	default:
 		WARN_ON(1);
 		break;

-- 


  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-01-22 17:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-01-22 17:37 [RFC PATCH 00/19] lockdep series Peter Zijlstra
2009-01-22 17:37 ` [RFC PATCH 01/19] lockdep: annotate reclaim context (__GFP_NOFS) Peter Zijlstra
2009-01-22 19:40   ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-01-22 20:29     ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-01-23  7:33       ` Nick Piggin
2009-01-23  8:00         ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-01-23 15:08           ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-01-22 17:37 ` [RFC PATCH 02/19] lockdep: sanitize bit names Peter Zijlstra
2009-01-22 17:37 ` [RFC PATCH 03/19] lockdep: sanitize reclaim " Peter Zijlstra
2009-01-22 17:37 ` [RFC PATCH 04/19] lockdep: lockdep_states.h Peter Zijlstra
2009-01-22 17:37 ` [RFC PATCH 05/19] lockdep: simplify mark_held_locks Peter Zijlstra
2009-01-22 17:37 ` [RFC PATCH 06/19] lockdep: simplify mark_lock() Peter Zijlstra
2009-01-22 17:37 ` [RFC PATCH 07/19] lockdep: move state bit definitions around Peter Zijlstra
2009-01-22 17:37 ` [RFC PATCH 08/19] lockdep: generate the state bit definitions Peter Zijlstra
2009-01-22 17:37 ` [RFC PATCH 09/19] lockdep: generate usage strings Peter Zijlstra
2009-01-22 17:37 ` [RFC PATCH 10/19] lockdep: split up mark_lock_irq() Peter Zijlstra
2009-01-22 17:37 ` [RFC PATCH 11/19] lockdep: simplify the mark_lock_irq() helpers Peter Zijlstra
2009-01-22 17:37 ` [RFC PATCH 12/19] lockdep: further simplify " Peter Zijlstra
2009-01-22 17:37 ` [RFC PATCH 13/19] simplify mark_lock_irq() helpers #3 Peter Zijlstra
2009-01-22 17:37 ` [RFC PATCH 14/19] lockdep: merge the _READ mark_lock_irq() helpers Peter Zijlstra
2009-01-22 17:37 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2009-01-22 17:37 ` [RFC PATCH 16/19] lockdep: fully reduce mark_lock_irq() Peter Zijlstra
2009-01-22 17:37 ` [RFC PATCH 17/19] lockdep: simplify get_user_chars() Peter Zijlstra
2009-01-22 17:37 ` [RFC PATCH 18/19] lockdep: get_user_chars() redo Peter Zijlstra
2009-01-22 17:37 ` [RFC PATCH 19/19] lockdep: simplify check_prev_add_irq() Peter Zijlstra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090122174053.556474458@chello.nl \
    --to=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=npiggin@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox