From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Subject: [RFC PATCH 17/19] lockdep: simplify get_user_chars()
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 18:37:18 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090122174053.859726452@chello.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20090122173701.674448070@chello.nl
[-- Attachment #1: lockdep-get_usage_chars.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 2691 bytes --]
there's too much repetition of code..
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
---
kernel/lockdep.c | 65 ++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------------------
1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)
Index: linux-2.6/kernel/lockdep.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/lockdep.c
+++ linux-2.6/kernel/lockdep.c
@@ -467,54 +467,37 @@ const char * __get_key_name(struct lockd
return kallsyms_lookup((unsigned long)key, NULL, NULL, NULL, str);
}
-void
-get_usage_chars(struct lock_class *class, char *c1, char *c2, char *c3,
- char *c4, char *c5, char *c6)
+static inline unsigned long lock_flag(enum lock_usage_bit bit)
{
- *c1 = '.', *c2 = '.', *c3 = '.', *c4 = '.', *c5 = '.', *c6 = '.';
-
- if (class->usage_mask & LOCKF_USED_IN_HARDIRQ)
- *c1 = '+';
- else
- if (class->usage_mask & LOCKF_ENABLED_HARDIRQ)
- *c1 = '-';
+ return 1UL << bit;
+}
- if (class->usage_mask & LOCKF_USED_IN_SOFTIRQ)
- *c2 = '+';
- else
- if (class->usage_mask & LOCKF_ENABLED_SOFTIRQ)
- *c2 = '-';
+static char get_usage_char(struct lock_class *class, enum lock_usage_bit bit)
+{
+ char c = '.';
- if (class->usage_mask & LOCKF_ENABLED_HARDIRQ_READ)
- *c3 = '-';
- if (class->usage_mask & LOCKF_USED_IN_HARDIRQ_READ) {
- *c3 = '+';
- if (class->usage_mask & LOCKF_ENABLED_HARDIRQ_READ)
- *c3 = '?';
- }
-
- if (class->usage_mask & LOCKF_ENABLED_SOFTIRQ_READ)
- *c4 = '-';
- if (class->usage_mask & LOCKF_USED_IN_SOFTIRQ_READ) {
- *c4 = '+';
- if (class->usage_mask & LOCKF_ENABLED_SOFTIRQ_READ)
- *c4 = '?';
+ if (class->usage_mask & lock_flag(bit + 2))
+ c = '+';
+ if (class->usage_mask & lock_flag(bit)) {
+ c = '-';
+ if (class->usage_mask & lock_flag(bit + 2))
+ c = '?';
}
- if (class->usage_mask & LOCKF_USED_IN_RECLAIM_FS)
- *c5 = '+';
- else
- if (class->usage_mask & LOCKF_ENABLED_RECLAIM_FS)
- *c5 = '-';
+ return c;
+}
- if (class->usage_mask & LOCKF_ENABLED_RECLAIM_FS_READ)
- *c6 = '-';
- if (class->usage_mask & LOCKF_USED_IN_RECLAIM_FS_READ) {
- *c6 = '+';
- if (class->usage_mask & LOCKF_ENABLED_RECLAIM_FS_READ)
- *c6 = '?';
- }
+void
+get_usage_chars(struct lock_class *class, char *c1, char *c2, char *c3,
+ char *c4, char *c5, char *c6)
+{
+ *c1 = get_usage_char(class, LOCK_USED_IN_HARDIRQ);
+ *c2 = get_usage_char(class, LOCK_USED_IN_SOFTITQ);
+ *c3 = get_usage_char(class, LOCK_USED_IN_HARDIRQ_READ);
+ *c4 = get_usage_char(class, LOCK_USED_IN_SOFTITQ_READ);
+ *c5 = get_usage_char(class, LOCK_USED_IN_RECLAIM_FS);
+ *c6 = get_usage_char(class, LOCK_USED_IN_RECLAIM_FS_READ);
}
static void print_lock_name(struct lock_class *class)
--
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-01-22 17:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-01-22 17:37 [RFC PATCH 00/19] lockdep series Peter Zijlstra
2009-01-22 17:37 ` [RFC PATCH 01/19] lockdep: annotate reclaim context (__GFP_NOFS) Peter Zijlstra
2009-01-22 19:40 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-01-22 20:29 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-01-23 7:33 ` Nick Piggin
2009-01-23 8:00 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-01-23 15:08 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-01-22 17:37 ` [RFC PATCH 02/19] lockdep: sanitize bit names Peter Zijlstra
2009-01-22 17:37 ` [RFC PATCH 03/19] lockdep: sanitize reclaim " Peter Zijlstra
2009-01-22 17:37 ` [RFC PATCH 04/19] lockdep: lockdep_states.h Peter Zijlstra
2009-01-22 17:37 ` [RFC PATCH 05/19] lockdep: simplify mark_held_locks Peter Zijlstra
2009-01-22 17:37 ` [RFC PATCH 06/19] lockdep: simplify mark_lock() Peter Zijlstra
2009-01-22 17:37 ` [RFC PATCH 07/19] lockdep: move state bit definitions around Peter Zijlstra
2009-01-22 17:37 ` [RFC PATCH 08/19] lockdep: generate the state bit definitions Peter Zijlstra
2009-01-22 17:37 ` [RFC PATCH 09/19] lockdep: generate usage strings Peter Zijlstra
2009-01-22 17:37 ` [RFC PATCH 10/19] lockdep: split up mark_lock_irq() Peter Zijlstra
2009-01-22 17:37 ` [RFC PATCH 11/19] lockdep: simplify the mark_lock_irq() helpers Peter Zijlstra
2009-01-22 17:37 ` [RFC PATCH 12/19] lockdep: further simplify " Peter Zijlstra
2009-01-22 17:37 ` [RFC PATCH 13/19] simplify mark_lock_irq() helpers #3 Peter Zijlstra
2009-01-22 17:37 ` [RFC PATCH 14/19] lockdep: merge the _READ mark_lock_irq() helpers Peter Zijlstra
2009-01-22 17:37 ` [RFC PATCH 15/19] lockdep: merge the !_READ " Peter Zijlstra
2009-01-22 17:37 ` [RFC PATCH 16/19] lockdep: fully reduce mark_lock_irq() Peter Zijlstra
2009-01-22 17:37 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2009-01-22 17:37 ` [RFC PATCH 18/19] lockdep: get_user_chars() redo Peter Zijlstra
2009-01-22 17:37 ` [RFC PATCH 19/19] lockdep: simplify check_prev_add_irq() Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090122174053.859726452@chello.nl \
--to=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=npiggin@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox