[patch 46/46] fs: sys_sync fix

[Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de>]

[-- Attachment #1: fs-sys_sync-fix.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 2100 bytes --]

2.6.28-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let us know.

------------------

From: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>

commit 856bf4d717feb8c55d4e2f817b71ebb70cfbc67b upstream.

s_syncing livelock avoidance was breaking data integrity guarantee of
sys_sync, by allowing sys_sync to skip writing or waiting for superblocks
if there is a concurrent sys_sync happening.

This livelock avoidance is much less important now that we don't have the
get_super_to_sync() call after every sb that we sync.  This was replaced
by __put_super_and_need_restart.

Signed-off-by: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>

---
 fs/fs-writeback.c  |   20 +-------------------
 include/linux/fs.h |    1 -
 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 20 deletions(-)

--- a/fs/fs-writeback.c
+++ b/fs/fs-writeback.c
@@ -652,18 +652,6 @@ void sync_inodes_sb(struct super_block *
 	sync_sb_inodes(sb, &wbc);
 }
 
-/*
- * Rather lame livelock avoidance.
- */
-static void set_sb_syncing(int val)
-{
-	struct super_block *sb;
-	spin_lock(&sb_lock);
-	list_for_each_entry_reverse(sb, &super_blocks, s_list)
-		sb->s_syncing = val;
-	spin_unlock(&sb_lock);
-}
-
 /**
  * sync_inodes - writes all inodes to disk
  * @wait: wait for completion
@@ -690,9 +678,6 @@ static void __sync_inodes(int wait)
 	spin_lock(&sb_lock);
 restart:
 	list_for_each_entry(sb, &super_blocks, s_list) {
-		if (sb->s_syncing)
-			continue;
-		sb->s_syncing = 1;
 		sb->s_count++;
 		spin_unlock(&sb_lock);
 		down_read(&sb->s_umount);
@@ -710,13 +695,10 @@ restart:
 
 void sync_inodes(int wait)
 {
-	set_sb_syncing(0);
 	__sync_inodes(0);
 
-	if (wait) {
-		set_sb_syncing(0);
+	if (wait)
 		__sync_inodes(1);
-	}
 }
 
 /**
--- a/include/linux/fs.h
+++ b/include/linux/fs.h
@@ -1124,7 +1124,6 @@ struct super_block {
 	struct rw_semaphore	s_umount;
 	struct mutex		s_lock;
 	int			s_count;
-	int			s_syncing;
 	int			s_need_sync_fs;
 	atomic_t		s_active;
 #ifdef CONFIG_SECURITY