Re: [patch 24/46] r6040: bump release number to 0.19

Jesper Juhl
2009-01-23T01:33:59Z

On Thu, 22 Jan 2009, Greg KH wrote:

> 2.6.28-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know.
>

It's simple enough, sure, but it doesn't really conform to the guidelines
set out for -stable patches in Documentation/stable_kernel_rules.txt :

...
- It must fix a real bug that bothers people (not a, "This could be a
problem..." type thing).
...
- It cannot contain any "trivial" fixes in it (spelling changes,
whitespace cleanups, etc).
...

I'm trying to come up with some real problem this fixes and a reason why
we want it in -stable, but I cannot...

>
> From: Florian Fainelli <florian@openwrt.org>
>
> [ Upstream commit: 4707470ae7441733822efcd680b0ef3971921c4d ]
>
> This patch bumps the release number of the driver.
>
> Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli <florian@openwrt.org>
> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
>
> ---
> drivers/net/r6040.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> --- a/drivers/net/r6040.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/r6040.c
> @@ -49,8 +49,8 @@
> #include <asm/processor.h>
>
> #define DRV_NAME "r6040"
> -#define DRV_VERSION "0.18"
> -#define DRV_RELDATE "13Jul2008"
> +#define DRV_VERSION "0.19"
> +#define DRV_RELDATE "18Dec2008"
>
> /* PHY CHIP Address */
> #define PHY1_ADDR 1 /* For MAC1 */
>

--
Jesper Juhl <jj@chaosbits.net> http://personal.chaosbits.net/
Don't top-post http://www.catb.org/~esr/jargon/html/T/top-post.html
Plain text mails only, please http://www.expita.com/nomime.html