public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Mike Travis <travis@sgi.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>,
	Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
	cpufreq@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] work_on_cpu: Use our own workqueue.
Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2009 00:15:37 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090124001537.7cfde78e.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090116191108.533053000@polaris-admin.engr.sgi.com>

On Fri, 16 Jan 2009 11:11:10 -0800 Mike Travis <travis@sgi.com> wrote:

> From: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
> 
> Impact: remove potential clashes with generic kevent workqueue
> 
> Annoyingly, some places we want to use work_on_cpu are already in
> workqueues.  As per Ingo's suggestion, we create a different workqueue
> for work_on_cpu.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
> Signed-off-by: Mike Travis <travis@sgi.com>
> ---
>  kernel/workqueue.c |    8 +++++++-
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> --- linux-2.6-for-ingo.orig/kernel/workqueue.c
> +++ linux-2.6-for-ingo/kernel/workqueue.c
> @@ -971,6 +971,8 @@ undo:
>  }
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> +static struct workqueue_struct *work_on_cpu_wq __read_mostly;

Pity the poor reader who comes along trying to work out why this exists.

>  struct work_for_cpu {
>  	struct work_struct work;
>  	long (*fn)(void *);
> @@ -1001,7 +1003,7 @@ long work_on_cpu(unsigned int cpu, long 
>  	INIT_WORK(&wfc.work, do_work_for_cpu);
>  	wfc.fn = fn;
>  	wfc.arg = arg;
> -	schedule_work_on(cpu, &wfc.work);
> +	queue_work_on(cpu, work_on_cpu_wq, &wfc.work);
>  	flush_work(&wfc.work);
>  
>  	return wfc.ret;
> @@ -1019,4 +1021,8 @@ void __init init_workqueues(void)
>  	hotcpu_notifier(workqueue_cpu_callback, 0);
>  	keventd_wq = create_workqueue("events");
>  	BUG_ON(!keventd_wq);
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> +	work_on_cpu_wq = create_workqueue("work_on_cpu");
> +	BUG_ON(!work_on_cpu_wq);
> +#endif

Yet another kernel thread for each CPU.  All because of some dung way
down in arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c.

Is there no other way?

  reply	other threads:[~2009-01-24  8:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 70+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-01-16 19:11 [PATCH 0/3] cpu freq: fix problems with work_on_cpu usage in acpi-cpufreq Mike Travis
2009-01-16 19:11 ` [PATCH 1/3] work_on_cpu: dont try to get_online_cpus() in work_on_cpu Mike Travis
2009-01-16 19:11 ` [PATCH 2/3] work_on_cpu: Use our own workqueue Mike Travis
2009-01-24  8:15   ` Andrew Morton [this message]
     [not found]     ` <200901261711.43943.rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
2009-01-26  7:01       ` Andrew Morton
2009-01-26 17:16         ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-26 18:35           ` Andrew Morton
2009-01-26 20:20             ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-26 20:43               ` Mike Travis
2009-01-26 21:00               ` Andrew Morton
2009-01-26 21:27                 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-26 21:35                   ` Andrew Morton
2009-01-26 21:45                     ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-26 22:01                       ` Andrew Morton
2009-01-26 22:05                         ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-26 22:16                           ` Andrew Morton
2009-01-26 22:20                             ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-26 22:50                               ` Andrew Morton
2009-01-26 22:59                                 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-26 23:42                                   ` Andrew Morton
2009-01-26 23:53                                     ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-27  0:42                                       ` Andrew Morton
2009-01-26 22:31                             ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-01-26 22:15                         ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-01-26 22:24                           ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-26 22:37                             ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-01-26 22:42                               ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-26 21:50                     ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-01-26 22:17                       ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-26 23:01                         ` Mike Travis
2009-01-27  0:09                           ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-01-27  7:15                         ` Rusty Russell
2009-01-27 17:55                           ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-01-27  7:05         ` Rusty Russell
2009-01-27  7:25           ` Andrew Morton
2009-01-27 15:28             ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-27 16:51               ` Andrew Morton
2009-01-28 13:02             ` Rusty Russell
2009-01-28 17:19               ` Mike Travis
2009-01-28 17:32                 ` Mike Travis
2009-01-29 10:39                   ` Rusty Russell
2009-01-28 19:44               ` Andrew Morton
2009-01-29  1:43                 ` Rusty Russell
2009-01-29  2:12                   ` Andrew Morton
2009-01-30  6:03                     ` Rusty Russell
2009-01-30  6:30                       ` Andrew Morton
2009-01-30 13:49                         ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-30 17:08                           ` Andrew Morton
2009-01-30 21:59                         ` Rusty Russell
2009-01-30 22:17                           ` Andrew Morton
2009-02-02 12:35                             ` Rusty Russell
2009-02-03  4:06                               ` Andrew Morton
2009-02-04  2:44                                 ` Rusty Russell
2009-02-04  3:01                                   ` Andrew Morton
2009-02-04 10:41                                     ` Rusty Russell
2009-02-04 15:36                                       ` Andrew Morton
2009-02-04 21:35                                         ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-04 21:48                                           ` Andrew Morton
2009-02-04 21:54                                             ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-04 23:45                                             ` Rusty Russell
2009-02-05 12:19                                             ` Pavel Machek
2009-02-05 17:44                                             ` Dmitry Adamushko
2009-02-10  8:54                                         ` Rusty Russell
2009-02-10  9:35                                           ` Andrew Morton
2009-02-11  0:32                                             ` Rusty Russell
2009-01-16 19:11 ` [PATCH 3/3] cpufreq: use work_on_cpu in acpi-cpufreq.c for drv_read and drv_write Mike Travis
2009-01-16 23:38 ` [PATCH 0/3] cpu freq: fix problems with work_on_cpu usage in acpi-cpufreq [PULL request] Mike Travis
2009-01-17 22:08   ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-19 17:11     ` Mike Travis
2009-01-19 17:26       ` Ingo Molnar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090124001537.7cfde78e.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=cpufreq@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=davej@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
    --cc=travis@sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox