From: "Wolfram Strepp" <wstrepp@gmx.de>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: peterz@infradead.org, dwmw2@infradead.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org
Subject: [PATCH] Optimization of function rb_erase() in lib/rbtree.c
Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2009 13:32:34 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090124123234.119090@gmx.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1232786621.4859.35.camel@laptop>
In the patch below, 4 redundant if-conditions in function __rb_erase_color() in lib/rbtree.c are removed.
Here an explanation for it. In pseudo-source-code, the
structure of the code is as follows:
if ((!A || B) && (!C || D)) {
.
.
.
} else {
if (!C || D) {//if this is true, it implies: (A == true) && (B == false)
if (A) {//hence this always evaluates to 'true'...
.
}
.
//at this point, C always becomes true, because of:
__rb_rotate_right/left();
//and:
other = parent->rb_right/left;
}
.
.
if (C) {//...and this too !
.
}
}
Signed-off-by: Wolfram Strepp <wstrepp@gmx.de>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
================================================
--- a/lib/rbtree.c
+++ b/lib/rbtree.c
@@ -163,17 +163,14 @@ static void __rb_erase_color(struct rb_node *node, struct rb_node *parent,
{
if (!other->rb_right || rb_is_black(other->rb_right))
{
- struct rb_node *o_left;
- if ((o_left = other->rb_left))
- rb_set_black(o_left);
+ rb_set_black(other->rb_left);
rb_set_red(other);
__rb_rotate_right(other, root);
other = parent->rb_right;
}
rb_set_color(other, rb_color(parent));
rb_set_black(parent);
- if (other->rb_right)
- rb_set_black(other->rb_right);
+ rb_set_black(other->rb_right);
__rb_rotate_left(parent, root);
node = root->rb_node;
break;
@@ -200,17 +197,14 @@ static void __rb_erase_color(struct rb_node *node, struct rb_node *parent,
{
if (!other->rb_left || rb_is_black(other->rb_left))
{
- register struct rb_node *o_right;
- if ((o_right = other->rb_right))
- rb_set_black(o_right);
+ rb_set_black(other->rb_right);
rb_set_red(other);
__rb_rotate_left(other, root);
other = parent->rb_left;
}
rb_set_color(other, rb_color(parent));
rb_set_black(parent);
- if (other->rb_left)
- rb_set_black(other->rb_left);
+ rb_set_black(other->rb_left);
__rb_rotate_right(parent, root);
node = root->rb_node;
break;
--
NUR NOCH BIS 31.01.! GMX FreeDSL - Telefonanschluss + DSL
für nur 16,37 EURO/mtl.!* http://dsl.gmx.de/?ac=OM.AD.PD003K11308T4569a
prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-01-24 12:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-01-20 21:55 [PATCH 1/2] Optimization of function rb_erase() in lib/rbtree.c Wolfram Strepp
2009-01-24 8:43 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-01-24 12:32 ` Wolfram Strepp [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090124123234.119090@gmx.net \
--to=wstrepp@gmx.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox