From: David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net>
To: Ed Swierk <eswierk@aristanetworks.com>
Cc: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>,
linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org,
Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@towertech.it>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
BARRE Sebastien <sbarre@sdelcc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rtc-ds1307: True SMBus compatibility
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 13:06:20 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200901261306.21059.david-b@pacbell.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1232951630.1329.4.camel@localhost.localdomain>
On Sunday 25 January 2009, Ed Swierk wrote:
> Here's another attempt at a patch for rtc-ds1307 that allows the driver
> to work with SMBus controllers like nforce2 that do not support i2c
> block transfers. The byte-oriented compatibility routines now give up
> after 10 unsuccessful attempts to read or write a block of registers
> without conflict.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ed Swierk <eswierk@aristanetworks.com>
Well, other than the *conceptual* ugliness of this (which
we seem to be stuck with, courtesy the board designer) ...
I have two patch format issues:
- Always put a line of whitespace after variable
declarations.
- Include text like the above as part of the patch,
even if you're stuck with a mailer that mangles
non-attached text.
You're using Evolution, which is mentioned in the
Documentation/email-clients.txt file as having a
way (albeit awkward) to send normal patch email.
Given those changes:
Acked-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Thanks.
- Dave
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-01-26 21:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-01-05 17:41 [PATCH] rtc-ds1307: True SMBus compatibility Ed Swierk
2009-01-06 22:48 ` David Brownell
2009-01-07 13:24 ` Jean Delvare
2009-01-07 15:22 ` Ed Swierk
2009-01-07 15:27 ` Jean Delvare
2009-01-07 15:43 ` Ed Swierk
2009-01-07 15:49 ` Jean Delvare
2009-01-19 23:59 ` Ed Swierk
2009-01-20 10:43 ` Jean Delvare
2009-01-26 6:33 ` Ed Swierk
2009-01-26 9:37 ` Jean Delvare
2009-01-26 21:06 ` David Brownell [this message]
2009-01-26 21:54 ` Ed Swierk
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-01-05 17:36 Ed Swierk
2009-01-06 13:35 ` BARRE Sebastien
2009-01-06 22:06 ` Alessandro Zummo
2009-01-06 22:13 ` Ed Swierk
2009-01-07 14:22 ` BARRE Sebastien
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200901261306.21059.david-b@pacbell.net \
--to=david-b@pacbell.net \
--cc=a.zummo@towertech.it \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=eswierk@aristanetworks.com \
--cc=khali@linux-fr.org \
--cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sbarre@sdelcc.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox