public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net>
To: Ed Swierk <eswierk@aristanetworks.com>
Cc: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>,
	linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org,
	Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@towertech.it>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	BARRE Sebastien <sbarre@sdelcc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rtc-ds1307: True SMBus compatibility
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 13:06:20 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200901261306.21059.david-b@pacbell.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1232951630.1329.4.camel@localhost.localdomain>

On Sunday 25 January 2009, Ed Swierk wrote:
> Here's another attempt at a patch for rtc-ds1307 that allows the driver
> to work with SMBus controllers like nforce2 that do not support i2c
> block transfers.  The byte-oriented compatibility routines now give up
> after 10 unsuccessful attempts to read or write a block of registers
> without conflict.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ed Swierk <eswierk@aristanetworks.com>

Well, other than the *conceptual* ugliness of this (which
we seem to be stuck with, courtesy the board designer) ...
I have two patch format issues:

 - Always put a line of whitespace after variable
   declarations.

 - Include text like the above as part of the patch,
   even if you're stuck with a mailer that mangles
   non-attached text.

You're using Evolution, which is mentioned in the
Documentation/email-clients.txt file as having a
way (albeit awkward) to send normal patch email.

Given those changes:

  Acked-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>

Thanks.

- Dave

  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-01-26 21:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-01-05 17:41 [PATCH] rtc-ds1307: True SMBus compatibility Ed Swierk
2009-01-06 22:48 ` David Brownell
2009-01-07 13:24 ` Jean Delvare
2009-01-07 15:22   ` Ed Swierk
2009-01-07 15:27     ` Jean Delvare
2009-01-07 15:43       ` Ed Swierk
2009-01-07 15:49         ` Jean Delvare
2009-01-19 23:59       ` Ed Swierk
2009-01-20 10:43         ` Jean Delvare
2009-01-26  6:33           ` Ed Swierk
2009-01-26  9:37             ` Jean Delvare
2009-01-26 21:06             ` David Brownell [this message]
2009-01-26 21:54               ` Ed Swierk
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-01-05 17:36 Ed Swierk
2009-01-06 13:35 ` BARRE Sebastien
2009-01-06 22:06   ` Alessandro Zummo
2009-01-06 22:13   ` Ed Swierk
2009-01-07 14:22     ` BARRE Sebastien

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200901261306.21059.david-b@pacbell.net \
    --to=david-b@pacbell.net \
    --cc=a.zummo@towertech.it \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=eswierk@aristanetworks.com \
    --cc=khali@linux-fr.org \
    --cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sbarre@sdelcc.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox