public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Ying Han <yinghan@google.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	npiggin@suse.de, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
	torvalds@linux-foundation.org, rusty@rustcorp.com.au,
	travis@sgi.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com, suresh.b.siddha@intel.com,
	arjan@infradead.org, hpa@zytor.com, tglx@linutronix.de,
	Mike Waychison <mikew@google.com>
Subject: Re: [git pull] cpus4096 tree, part 3
Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 00:21:39 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090126232139.GA29561@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <604427e00901261312w23a1f0f5y61fc5c6cc70297fb@mail.gmail.com>


* Ying Han <yinghan@google.com> wrote:

> Thank you Ingo and Andrew for the comments. I will take a look into it 
> ASAP and updates it here.

Note, my objection wasnt a hard NAK - just an observation. If all things 
considered Andrew still favors the VM_FAULT_RETRY approach then that's 
fine too i guess.

It's just that a quick look gave me the feeling of a retry flag tacked on 
to an existing codepath [and all the micro-overhead and complexity that 
this brings], instead of a clean refactoring of pagefault handling 
functionality into a higher MM level retry loop.

So the alternative has to be looked at and rejected because it's 
technically inferior - not because it's more difficult to implement. 
(which it certainly is)

	Ingo

  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-01-26 23:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-01-01  1:19 [PULL] cpumask tree Rusty Russell
2009-01-02 20:06 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-01-02 20:38   ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-02 23:31     ` Linus Torvalds
2009-01-03 19:38       ` [git pull] cpus4096 tree, part 3 Ingo Molnar
2009-01-03 20:28         ` Linus Torvalds
2009-01-03 20:36           ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-03 20:56             ` Linus Torvalds
2009-01-03 21:58               ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-04  3:35               ` Rusty Russell
2009-01-04  4:28                 ` Mike Travis
2009-01-03 21:38             ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-03 22:00               ` Linus Torvalds
2009-01-03 22:37                 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-05  1:14                   ` Nick Piggin
2009-01-05  1:16                     ` Nick Piggin
2009-01-26 19:00                       ` Andrew Morton
2009-01-26 19:09                         ` Linus Torvalds
2009-01-26 19:30                           ` Andrew Morton
2009-01-26 20:09                         ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-26 20:44                           ` Andrew Morton
     [not found]                             ` <604427e00901261312w23a1f0f5y61fc5c6cc70297fb@mail.gmail.com>
2009-01-26 23:21                               ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2009-01-26 23:44                                 ` Andrew Morton
2009-01-07 17:30                     ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-03 20:58           ` Mike Travis
2009-01-03  7:20     ` [PULL] cpumask tree Rusty Russell
2009-01-03 10:52       ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-03 11:59         ` [PATCH] ia64: cpumask fix for is_affinity_mask_valid() Ingo Molnar
2009-01-03 12:19           ` [PATCH] cpumask: convert RCU implementations, fix Ingo Molnar
2009-01-04  3:43           ` [PATCH] ia64: cpumask fix for is_affinity_mask_valid() Rusty Russell
2009-01-04  4:20             ` Mike Travis
2009-01-04 12:38               ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-03 14:58         ` [PULL] cpumask tree Mike Travis
2009-01-03 15:06           ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-03 15:31             ` Mike Travis
2009-01-03 15:47               ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-03 15:52                 ` Mike Travis
2009-01-03 16:00                 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-03 16:09                   ` Mike Travis
2009-01-03 16:42                     ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-03 16:48                       ` Mike Travis
2009-01-03 17:45                     ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-03 18:13                       ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-03 18:14                       ` Mike Travis
2009-01-03  0:23   ` Rusty Russell
2009-01-08 19:10 ` David Daney

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090126232139.GA29561@elte.hu \
    --to=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=arjan@infradead.org \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mikew@google.com \
    --cc=npiggin@suse.de \
    --cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
    --cc=suresh.b.siddha@intel.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=travis@sgi.com \
    --cc=venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com \
    --cc=yinghan@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox