From: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
To: Shane Hathaway <shane@hathawaymix.org>
Cc: Daolong Wang <ahlongxp@gmail.com>, Jeff Dike <jdike@addtoit.com>,
Rob Landley <rob@landley.net>,
user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Am?rico Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [uml-devel] [Patch] uml: fix a link error
Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 09:23:14 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090127092314.GZ28946@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <49753063.8040007@hathawaymix.org>
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 07:01:07PM -0700, Shane Hathaway wrote:
> The problem is that the name "sigprocmask" is getting renamed to
> "kernel_sigprocmask" by a compiler directive in arch/um/Makefile, then
> that name gets mangled into "sys_kernel_sigprocmask" by the
> SYSCALL_DEFINE3(sigprocmask, ...) macro in kernel/signal.c.
>
> So, instead of the patch suggested earlier, I added the following line
> to arch/um/sys-i386/sys_call_table.S:
>
> #define sys_sigprocmask sys_kernel_sigprocmask
Interesting... Everything else aside, we have difference in e.g.
SYSCALL_DEFINE0 and SYSCALL_DEFINE3 behaviours: SYSCALL_DEFINE0(name)
will *not* do macro expansion in name and SYSCALL_DEFINE3(name, blah, ...)
will.
The reason is that we have name carried through extra layer of macros
in the latter case. Argument is *NOT* a subject to expansion when it
is used with ##; however, passing it to another macro will expand it
just fine.
Regardless of the kludge with -D used by uml, I'd say that we want consistency
here; keeping the original behaviour would also be nice.
How about
#define SYSCALL_DEFINE1(name,...) SYSCALL_DEFINEx(1, _##name, __VA_ARGS__)
etc.
with
#define SYSCALL_DEFINEx(x, name, ...) \
asmlinkage long sys##name(__SC_DECL##x(__VA_ARGS__))
?
That gives consistent behaviour in all cases and avoids the insane side
effects like this one.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-01-27 9:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-01-15 19:40 [Patch] uml: fix a link error Américo Wang
2009-01-16 20:41 ` Andrew Morton
2009-01-16 21:38 ` Jeff Dike
2009-01-17 9:28 ` [uml-devel] " Rob Landley
2009-01-18 6:23 ` Daolong Wang
2009-01-19 15:21 ` Jeff Dike
2009-01-20 1:46 ` Daolong Wang
2009-01-20 2:01 ` Shane Hathaway
2009-01-27 9:23 ` Al Viro [this message]
2009-02-04 17:26 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2009-02-04 20:32 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2009-02-04 20:40 ` Greg KH
2009-02-04 20:54 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2009-02-07 11:59 ` Heiko Carstens
2009-02-08 9:07 ` Américo Wang
2009-02-08 9:12 ` Américo Wang
2009-02-12 14:40 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2009-01-18 8:32 ` Américo Wang
2009-01-18 23:29 ` Rob Landley
2009-01-22 16:12 ` Américo Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090127092314.GZ28946@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
--to=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=ahlongxp@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=jdike@addtoit.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rob@landley.net \
--cc=shane@hathawaymix.org \
--cc=user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox