From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Tony Battersby <tonyb@cybernetics.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, olsajiri@gmail.com, jkosina@suse.cz
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] make shm_get_stat() more robust
Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 15:00:21 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090127150021.ee417076.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <497F8F2D.600@cybernetics.com>
On Tue, 27 Jan 2009 17:48:13 -0500
Tony Battersby <tonyb@cybernetics.com> wrote:
> shm_get_stat() assumes idr_find(&shm_ids(ns).ipcs_idr) returns
> "struct shmid_kernel *"; all other callers assume that it returns
> "struct kern_ipc_perm *". This works because "struct kern_ipc_perm"
> is currently the first member of "struct shmid_kernel", but it would
> be better to use container_of() to prevent future breakage.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tony Battersby <tonyb@cybernetics.com>
> ---
> --- linux-2.6.29-rc2-git3/ipc/shm.c.orig 2009-01-27 16:23:10.000000000 -0500
> +++ linux-2.6.29-rc2-git3/ipc/shm.c 2009-01-27 16:24:19.000000000 -0500
> @@ -551,12 +551,14 @@ static void shm_get_stat(struct ipc_name
> in_use = shm_ids(ns).in_use;
>
> for (total = 0, next_id = 0; total < in_use; next_id++) {
> + struct kern_ipc_perm *ipc;
> struct shmid_kernel *shp;
> struct inode *inode;
>
> - shp = idr_find(&shm_ids(ns).ipcs_idr, next_id);
> - if (shp == NULL)
> + ipc = idr_find(&shm_ids(ns).ipcs_idr, next_id);
> + if (ipc == NULL)
> continue;
> + shp = container_of(ipc, struct shmid_kernel, shm_perm);
>
> inode = shp->shm_file->f_path.dentry->d_inode;
>
yup, well spotted.
It would be good to add a little typesafe wrapper:
static inline struct kern_ipc_perm *shm_idr_find(struct ipc_ids *ipc_ids)
{
return idr_find(&ipc_ids->ipcs_idr);
}
(or similar)
so that this sort of mistake cannot happen again.
As you've found, open-coded use of a bare void*-returning function is a
bit dangerous.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-01-27 23:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-01-27 22:48 [PATCH 2/2] make shm_get_stat() more robust Tony Battersby
2009-01-27 23:00 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090127150021.ee417076.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=jkosina@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=olsajiri@gmail.com \
--cc=tonyb@cybernetics.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox